Recalibration of four empirical reference crop evapotranspiration models using a hybrid Differential Evolution-Grey Wolf Optimizer algorithm

Long Zhao, Shuo Yang, Xinbo Zhao, Yi Shi, Shiming Feng, Xuguang Xing, Shuangchen Chen

Abstract


Accurate estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) is essential for water resource management and irrigation scheduling. A multitude of empirical models have been employed to estimate ET0, yielding satisfactory outcomes. However, the performance of each model is contingent upon the empirical parameters utilized. This study examines the applicability of four empirical ET0 models, namely the Makkink (Mak), Irmark-Allen (IA), improved Baier-Robertson (MBR), and Brutsaert-Stricker (BS) models. Meteorological data from 24 weather stations across various regions in China were procured and employed to assess the ET0 simulation results. The study employed the Differential Evolution (DE) optimization algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm, and a hybrid algorithm that combines DE and GWO algorithms (DE-GWO algorithm) to optimize the parameters of the four empirical models. The findings revealed that the optimization algorithms significantly enhanced the regional adaptability of the four models, particularly the BS model. The DE-GWO algorithm demonstrated superior optimization performance (RMSE=0.055-0.372, R²=0.912-0.998, MAE=0.037-0.311, and FS=0.864-0.982) compared to the DE (RMSE=0.101-2.015, R²=0.529-0.997, MAE=0.075-1.695, and FS=0.383-0.967) and GWO (RMSE=0.158-0.915, R²=0.694-0.987, MAE=0.111-0.701, and FS=0.688-0.947) algorithms. The DE-GWO-optimized BS model was the most accurate and improved, followed by the MBR model. The IA and Mak models also showed slightly better performance after optimization with the DE-GWO algorithm. The DE-GWO-optimized BS model performed better in the southern agricultural region than in other regions. It is recommended to utilize the DE-GWO to enhance the accurate prediction of empirical ET0 models across the nine agricultural regions of China.
Keywords: reference crop evapotranspiration, empirical model, nine agricultural regions of China, hybrid algorithm, Brutsaert-Stricker
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251801.9380

Keywords


reference crop evapotranspiration, empirical model, nine agricultural regions of China, hybrid algorithm, Brutsaert-Stricker

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wang J Z, Raza A, Hu Y G, Ali Buttar N, Shoaib M, Saber K, et al. Development of monthly reference evapotranspiration machine learning models and mapping of pakistan - A comparative study. Water, 2022; 14(10): 1666.

Mueller N D, Gerber J S, Johnston M, Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Foley J A. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 2012; 490: 254–257.

Raziei T, Pereira L S. Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 2013; 121: 1–18.

Hargreaves G H, Samani Z A. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1985; 1(2): 96–99.

Heydari M M, Tajamoli A, Ghoreishi S H, Darbe-Esfahani M K, Gilasi H. Evaluation and calibration of Blaney-Criddle equation for estimating reference evapotranspiration in semiarid and arid regions. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015; 74(5): 4053–4063.

Priestley C H B, Taylor R J. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 1972; 100(2): 81–92.

Charytanowicz M, Kulczycki P, Kowalski P A, Łukasik S, Czabak-Garbacz R. An evaluation of utilizing geometric features for wheat grain classification using X-ray images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018; 144: 260–268.

Yong S L S, Ng J L, Huang Y F, Ang C K, Kamal N A, Mirzaei M, et al. Enhanced daily reference evapotranspiration estimation using optimized hybrid support vector regression models. Water Resources Management, 2024; 38(11): 4213–4241.

Allen R G, Pruitt W O, Wright J L, Howell T A, Ventura F, Snyder R, et al. A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method. Agricultural Water Management, 2006; 81(1-2): 1–22.

Zhao L, Zhao X B, Pan X L, Shi Y, Qiu Z M, Li X Z, et al. Prediction of daily reference crop evapotranspiration in different Chinese climate zones: Combined application of key meteorological factors and Elman algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 2022; 610: 127822.

Allen R G. FAO56 Irrigation and Drainage Paper. Crop Evapotranpiration. Irrigation and Drainage, 1998; 300(56): 300.

Djaman K, Irmak S, ASCE M, Kabenge I, Futakuchi K. Evaluation of FAO-56 Penman-Monteith Model with limited data and the Valiantzas Models for estimating grass-reference evapotranspiration in sahelian conditions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2016; 142(11): 04016044.

Rawat K S, Singh S K, Bala A, Szabó S. Estimation of crop evapotranspiration through spatial distributed crop coefficient in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 2019; 213: 922–933.

Petković B, Petković D, Kuzman B, Milovančević M, Wakil K, Ho L S, et al. Neuro-fuzzy estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration by neuro fuzzy logic based on weather conditions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020; 173: 105358.

Cammalleri C, Ciraolo G. A simple method to directly retrieve reference evapotranspiration from geostationary satellite images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2013; 21: 149–158.

Gunston H, Batchelor C H. A comparison of the Priestley-Taylor and Penman methods for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in tropical countries. Agricultural Water Management, 1983; 6(1): 65–77.

Bormann H. Sensitivity analysis of 18 different potential evapotranspiration models to observed climatic change at German climate stations. Climatic Change, 2011; 104(3): 729–753.

Gharbia S S, Smullen T, Gill L, Johnston P, Pilla F. Spatially distributed potential evapotranspiration modeling and climate projections. Science of The Total Environment, 2018; 633: 571–592.

Li S, Kang S Z, Zhang L, Zhang J H, Du T S, Tong L, et al. Evaluation of six potential evapotranspiration models for estimating crop potential and actual evapotranspiration in arid regions. Journal of Hydrology, 2016; 543: 450–461.

Yang Y, Chen R S, Han C T, Liu Z W. Evaluation of 18 models for calculating potential evapotranspiration in different climatic zones of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021; 244: 106545.

Tabari H, Grismer M E, Trajkovic S. Comparative analysis of 31 reference evapotranspiration methods under humid conditions. Irrigation Science, 2013; 31(2): 107–117.

Zhao C Y, Nan Z R, Feng Z D. GIS-assisted spatially distributed modeling of the potential evapotranspiration in semi-arid climate of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004; 58(3): 387–403.

Majidi M, Alizadeh A, Farid A, Vazifedoust M. Estimating evaporation from lakes and reservoirs under limited data condition in a Semi-Arid Region. Water Resources Management, 2015; 29(10): 3711–3733.

Feng Y, Cui N B, Zhao L, Hu X T, Gong D Z. Comparison of ELM, GANN, WNN and empirical models for estimating reference evapotranspiration in humid region of Southwest China. Journal of Hydrology, 2016; 536: 376–383.

Fang R M, Song S J. Daily reference evapotranspiration prediction of Tieguanyin tea plants based on mathematical morphology clustering and improved generalized regression neural network. Agricultural Water Management, 2020; 236: 106177.

Mohammadi B, Mehdizadeh S. Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration via a novel approach based on support vector regression coupled with whale optimization algorithm. Agricultural Water Management, 2020; 237: 106145.

Wu Z J, Chen X, Cui N B, Zhu B, Gong D Z, Han L, et al. Optimized empirical model based on whale optimization algorithm for simulate daily reference crop evapotranspiration in different climatic regions of China. Journal of Hydrology, 2022; 612: 128084.

Zhang Q W, Cui N B, Feng Y, Gong D Z, Hu X T. Improvement of Makkink model for reference evapotranspiration estimation using temperature data in Northwest China. Journal of Hydrology, 2018; 566: 264–273.

Tao H, Diop L, Bodian A, Djaman K, Ndiaye P M, Yaseen Z M. Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso. Agricultural Water Management, 2018; 208: 140–151.

Yaseen Z M, Ebtehaj I, Bonakdari H, Deo R C, Danandeh Mehr A, Mohtar W H M W, et al. Novel approach for streamflow forecasting using a hybrid ANFIS-FFA model. Journal of Hydrology, 2017; 554: 263–276.

Chia M Y, Huang Y F, Koo C H. Support vector machine enhanced empirical reference evapotranspiration estimation with limited meteorological parameters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020; 175(1): 105577.

Makkink G F. Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters. J inst of Water Eng, 1957.

Shiri J, Nazemi A H, Sadraddini A A, Marti P, Fakheri Fard A, Kisi O, et al. Alternative heuristics equations to the Priestley–Taylor approach: assessing reference evapotranspiration estimation. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019; 138(1): 831–848.

Baier W, Robertson G W. Estimation of latent evaporation from simple weather observations. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1965; 45(3): 276–284.

Brutsaert W, Stricker H. An advection-aridity approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research, 1979; 15(2): 443–450.

Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution - A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997; 11(4): 341–359.

Roy D K, Lal A, Sarker K K, Saha K K, Datta B. Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Agricultural Water Management, 2021; 255: 107003.

Wu L F, Huang G M, Fan J L, Ma X, Zhou H M, Zeng W Z. Hybrid extreme learning machine with meta-heuristic algorithms for monthly pan evaporation prediction. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020; 168: 105115.

Mirjalili S, Mirjalili S M, Lewis A. Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014; 69: 46–61.

Rodríguez L, Castillo O, Soria J, Melin P, Valdez F, Gonzalez C I, et al. A fuzzy hierarchical operator in the grey wolf optimizer algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 2017; 57: 315–328.

Dong J H, Liu X G, Huang G M, Fan J L, Wu L F, Wu J. Comparison of four bio-inspired algorithms to optimize KNEA for predicting monthly reference evapotranspiration in different climate zones of China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021; 186: 106211.




Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office