Design and test of target-oriented profile modeling of unmanned aerial vehicle spraying

Peng Qi, Xiongkui He, Yajia Liu, Yong Ma, Zhiming Wu, Jianwo Wang

Abstract


Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a new frontier in specialized plant protection equipment, which will increasingly be utilized in modern sustainable agricultural applications. The use of UAVs retrofitted with new structures for spraying allows precision pesticide applications on fruit canopies, which have positive effects on pesticide reduction, along with fruit quality and production improvement. In this work, a precision toward-target device (BUAV) was established through profiling of fruit branch modeling, along with a quality analysis of the coverage in a pear orchard compared to a conventional multi-rotor UAV (CUAV). Coverage under different canopy sections and on both sides of leaves was evaluated using Polyvinyl Chloride card samplers. The results indicate that coverage of the BUAV was 0.98% and 1.41% on the abaxial of the lower leaves interior of the canopy, which was 2.38 and 3.14 times higher than that of the CUAV. The BUAV tended to increase coverage in the course-parallel direction, while both the course-parallel and vertical directions increased the deposition coverage on the abaxial side of the interior canopy leaves by 1.8 times and 2.1 times compared to the CUAV, respectively. Simultaneously, the BUAV increased the proportion of droplets deposited on the canopy and reduced ground loss. The BUAV can improve the distribution of the wind field within the canopy effectively and improve the droplet deposition on the reverse side of the interior bore blade.
Keywords: UAV, droplet coverage, target pesticide application, leaf abaxial side, profile spraying, orchard
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221503.6753

Citation: Qi P, He X K, Liu Y J, Ma Y, Wu Z M, Wang J W. Design and test of target-oriented profile modeling of unmanned aerial vehicle spraying. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(3): 85–91.

Keywords


UAV, droplet coverage, target pesticide application, leaf abaxial side, profile spraying, orchard

Full Text:

PDF

References


Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Data-base (FAOSTAT). 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL Accessed on [2020-05-20]

National Bureau of Statistics of China. Annual Data. http://data.stats.gov.cn/search.htm. Accessed on [2020-05-20]

Zhang S L. Major problems facing the development of China's pear industry and countermeasures. China Fruit Industry, 2016; 33(12): 12–14. (in Chinese)

Zhang S, Xie Z H. Current status, trends, main problems and the suggestions on development of pear industry in China. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019; 36(8): 1067–1072. (in Chinese)

Tianna DuPont S, Strohm C, Nottingham L, Rendon D. Evaluation of an integrated pest management program for central Washington pear orchards. Biol Control, 2021; 152: 104390. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104390.

Li Z X, Nie J Y, Yan Z, Xu G F, Li H F, Kuang L X, et al. Risk assessment and ranking of pesticide residues in Chinese pears. J Integr Agric, 2015; 14(11): 2328–2339.

He X K. Research progress and developmental recommendations on precision spraying technology and equipment in China. Smart Agriculture, 2020; 2(1): 133–146.

Changling W, Xiongkui H, Jane B, Peng Q, Yi Y, Wanling G. Effect of downwash airflow field of 8-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle on spray deposition distribution characteristics under different flight parameters. Smart Agric, 2020; 2(4): 124–136.

Wang X N, He X K, Wang C L, Wang Z C, Li L L, Wang S L, et al. Spray drift characteristics of fuel powered single-rotor UAV for plant protection. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(1): 117–123. (in Chinese)

Sinha R, Ranjan R, Khot L R, Hoheisel G A, Grieshop M J. Comparison of within canopy deposition for a solid set canopy delivery system (SSCDS) and an axial–fan airblast sprayer in a vineyard. Crop Prot., 2020; 132: 105124. doi: 10.1016/J.CROPRO.2020.105124.

Bahlol H Y, Chandel A K, Hoheisel G A, Khot L R. The smart spray analytical system: Developing understanding of output air-assist and spray patterns from orchard sprayers. Crop Prot., 2020; 127: 104977. doi: 10.1016/J.CROPRO.2019.104977.

Lyu X L, Zhang M N, Chang Y H, Lei X H, Yang Q S. Influence of deflector angles for orchard air-assisted sprayer on 3D airflow distribution. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(15): 81–87. (in Chinese)

Foqué D, Nuyttens D. Effects of nozzle type and spray angle on spray deposition in ivy pot plants. Pest Manag Sci., 2011; 67(2): 199–208.

Bakker T, Wouters H, van Asselt K, Bontsema J, Tang L, Müller J, et al. A vision based row detection system for sugar beet. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008; 60(1): 87–95.

He X K. Rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for plant protection and application technology in China. Outlooks on Pest Manag., 2018; 29(4): 162–167.

Zhang X Q, Song X P, Liang Y J, Qin Z Q, Zhang B Q, Wei J J, et al. Effects of spray parameters of drone on the droplet deposition in sugarcane canopy. Sugar Tech., 2020; 22(4): 583–588.

Li J Y, Lan Y B, Zhou Z Y, Zeng S, Huang C, Yao W X, et al. Design and test of operation parameters for rice air broadcasting by unmanned aerial vehicle. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(5): 24–32.

Wang B J, Pan B, Jiang L, Lin Y, Zhao S, Mo Y X. Effects of spraying parameters of plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle on deposition distribution of droplets in pitaya canopy. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020; 22(10): 101–109. (in Chinese)

Liu Q, Lan Y B, Shan C F, Mao Y D. The influence of spraying parameters of aerial application on droplet deposition characteristics for apple fields. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2020; 42(9): 173–180.

Han P, Cui Z Y, Yan X J, Shi W P, Wang F L, Yuan H Z. Effect of three types of spray adjuvants on the distribution of spray droplet deposition in hilly citrus under precise fruit tree operation mode of unmanned aerial vehicles. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2020; 22(6): 1076–1084. (in Chinese)

Salyani M, Fox R D. Evaluation of spray quality by oil and water-sensitive papers. Transactions of the ASAE, 1999; 42(1): 37–43.

Baetens K, Nuyttens D, Verboven P, De Schampheleire M, Nicolaï B, Ramon H. Predicting drift from field spraying by means of a 3D computational fluid dynamics model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2007; 56(2): 161–173.

Xu T Y, Yu F H, Cao Y, Du W, Ma M Y. Vertical distribution of spray droplet deposition of plant protection multi rotor UAV for Japonica rice.

Transactions of the CSAM, 2017; 48(10): 101–107. (in Chinese)

Kiran R, Ahmed R, Salehi S. Experiments and CFD modelling for two phase flow in a vertical annulus. Chem Eng Res Des, 2020; 153: 201–11.

Zhang H, Qi L, Wu Y, Musiu E M, Cheng Z, Wang P. Numerical simulation of airflow field from a six–rotor plant protection drone using lattice Boltzmann method. Biosyst Eng., 2020; 197: 336–351.

Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Lan Y B, Hu L, Zang Y, Liu A M, et al. Distribution of canopy wind field produced by rotor unmanned aerial vehicle pollination operation. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015; 31(3): 77–86. (in Chinese)

Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Hu L, Zang Y, Xu S, Liu A M, et al. Optimization of operation parameters for supplementary pollination in hybrid rice breeding using round multi-axis multi-rotor electric unmanned helicopter. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(11): 1–9. (in Chinese)

Tang Q, Zhang R R, Chen L P, Deng W, Xu M, Xu G, et al. Numerical simulation of the downwash flow field and droplet movement from an unmanned helicopter for crop spraying. Comput Electron Agric., 2020; 174: 105468. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105468.

Zhang H, Qi L J, Wu Y L, Cheng Z Z, Liu W W, Musiu E, et al. Distribution characteristics of rotor downwash airflow field under spraying on orchard using unmanned aerial vehicle. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019; 35(18): 44–54. (in Chinese)

Zhang H, Qi L J, Wu Y L, Liu W W, Cheng Z Z, Musiu E. Spatio-temporal distribution of down-wash airflow for multi-rotor plant protection UAV based on porous model. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019; 50(2): 112–122. (in Chinese)

Yang Z L, Ge L Z, Qi L J, Cheng Y F, Wu Y L. Influence of UAV rotor down-wash airflow on spray width. Transactions of the CSAM, 2018; 49(1): 116–122. (in Chinese)

Wang C L, He X K, Zeng A J. Measuring method and experiment on spray drift of chemicals applied by UAV sprayer based on an artificial orchard test bench. Transactions of the CSAE, 2020; 36(13): 56–66. (in Chinese)

Zhao H Y, Xie C, Liu F M, He X K, Zhang J, Song J L. Effects of sprayers and nozzles on spray drift and terminal residues of imidacloprid on wheat. Crop Prot, 2014; 60: 78–82.

Herbst A, Bonds J, Wang Z C, Zeng A J, He X K, Goff P, et al. The influence of unmanned agricultural aircraft system design on spray drift. J fur Kult, 2020; 72(1): 1–11. doi:10.5073/JfK.2020.01.01.




Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office