Adaptabilities of different harvesters to peanut plants after cutting stalks

Youqing Chen, Gongpu Wang, Jiangtao Wang, Peng Zhang, Bing Wang, Zhichao Hu

Abstract


At present, there are no harvesters specifically adapted to process peanuts after cutting stalks. In particular, methods for harvesting peanuts after cutting stalks have not been reported thus far. Therefore, to utilize peanut stalks as feed when harvesting plastic-film-grown peanuts, and to improve industry benefits, a three-stage harvesting method is proposed herein. In view of the three-stage harvesting method, the peanut stalks are cut before digging, with the remaining peanut plants being shorter, thereby increasing the peanut pod-stalk ratio. To investigate the adaptabilities of existing harvesters in harvesting peanuts after cutting stalks, three types of peanut harvesters—the self-propelled pick-up combine harvester, trailed pick-up combine harvester, and peanut picker were used to conduct a comparative test on harvesting intact peanut plants and plants after cutting stalks. The loss, breakage and impurity rates were used as evaluation indicators. The loss rates of these three harvesters were 14.64%, 16.44% and 1.33%; the breakage rates were 21.28%, 21.92% and 20.00%, and impurity rates were 4.60%, 8.76% and 9.06%. Analysis of variance showed that cutting stalks had a significant impact on the work qualities of the three harvesters (p < 0.05). With regard to the loss rate, results revealed that: the two peanut combine harvesters could not be adapted to harvest peanut plants after cutting stalks. The three harvesters had good adaptability to harvest peanut plants after cutting stalks, considering the breakage rate; however, based on the impurity rate, the three harvesters could not be adapted to harvest peanut plants after cutting stalks. The losses of the two combine harvesters consisted mainly of dropped and missed picking, with the sum of the losses accounting for 99.87% and 97.99% of the total losses of the two harvesters, respectively; this suggests that the drum pickup of the combine harvesters could not adapt to harvesting the peanut after cutting stalks. The breakage rates of the three harvesters were considerably reduced, suggesting that the pod picking devices of the three harvesters were suitable for harvesting the peanut after cutting stalks; the impurity rates of the three harvesters were considerably increased, indicating that the pod picking and cleaning devices of the three harvesters were not suitable for harvesting peanut after cutting stalks. To improve the adaptabilities of the harvesters, it is suggested that the speed of pickup elastic tooth, lateral spacing between adjacent elastic teeth, concave screen hole size of pod picking device, the structure and motion parameters of cleaning device should be optimized. The results of this study provide a reference for the development and improvement of peanut harvesters suitable for harvesting peanuts after the cutting of stalks.
Keywords: agricultural machinery, peanut, peanut harvesting after cutting stalks, peanut combine harvester, peanut picker, adaptability research
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221502.6515

Citation: Chen Y Q, Wang G P, Wang J T, Zhang P, Wang B, Hu Z C. Adaptabilities of different harvesters to peanut plants after cutting stalks. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(2): 93–101.

Keywords


agricultural machinery, peanut, peanut harvesting after cutting stalks, peanut combine harvester, peanut picker, adaptability research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistical database. http://faostat3.fao.org. Accessed on [2020-12-20]

Bi C H, Chi S Y, Hua Z, Li D, Huang Z G, Liu Y. Rheological properties and fractal-rheology analysis of peanut protein isolate suspension. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(6): 220–226.

Yan J C, Xie H X, Wei H, Wu H C, You Z Y. Optimizing the drying parameters of a fixed bed with reversing ventilation for peanut using computer simulation. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(5): 255–266.

Gao L X, Chen Z Y, Chen C, Butts C L. Development course of peanut harvest mechanization technology of the United States and enlightenment to China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(12): 1–9. (in Chinese)

Chen Z Y, Gao L X, Chen C, Butts C L. Analysis on technology status and development of peanut harvest mechanization of China and the United States. Transactions of the CSAM, 2017; 48(4): 1–21. (in Chinese)

Xu H B, Hu Z C, Wu F, Gu F W, Wei H, Yan J C. Design and experiment of network chain type residual plastic film collector for peanut field. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(17): 1–9. (in Chinese)

Zhang D, Hu W L, Liu H B, Du L F, Xu Y, Cheng Z H, et al. Characteristics of residual mulching film and residual coefficient of typical crops in North China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016; 32(3): 1–5. (in Chinese)

Yan C R, He W Q, Mei X R, et al. (Eds) Agricultural application of plastic film and its residual pollution prevention. Beijing: Science Press, 2015; pp.16, 279p. (in Chinese)

Wang X Y, Xue S, Xie G H. Value-taking for residue factor as a parameter to assess the field residue of field crops. Journal of China Agriculture University, 2012; 17(1): 1–8. (in Chinese)

Zhao X W, Bu D P, Liu Q S, Yang G, Zhang P H. Application of silage peanut vine in feed. China Feed, 2019; 9: 30–32. (in Chinese)

Liu J C, Zhang M, Liu J, Liu J N. The utilization status of peanut stalk in livestock and poultry production and its biological fermentation technology. China Feed, 2017; 20: 36–38. (in Chinese)

Xu H B, Zhang P, Hu Z C, Mao E R, Yan J C, Yang H G. Analysis of dust diffusion from a self-propelled peanut combine using computational fluid dynamics. Biosystems Engineering, 2022; 215: 104-114.

Zhang P, Xu H B, Hu Z C, Chen Y Q, Cao M Z, Yu Z Y, et al. Characteristics of agricultural dust emissions from harvesting operations: case study of a whole-feed peanut combine. Agriculture, 2021; 11: 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111068.

Chen Y Q, Hu Z C, Wang G P, Wang B K, Wu F, Gu F W, et al. Cutting and throwing device for self-propelled intelligent peanut stalk harvester and peanut stalk harvesting method: China, ZL202110076224.0. 2022-02-16. (in Chinese)

Cao M Z, Hu Z C, Zhang P, Yu Z Y, Ye J F, Wang S Y. Experimental study on the key technology of full-feeding peanut picking by tangential flow method. International Agriculture Engineering Journal, 2019; 28(4): 66–74.

Wang B, Zhang Y H, Peng B L, Wu H C, Chen Y Q, Hu Z C. Parameters optimization on pod-picking device of peanut semi-feeding four rows combine harvester. International Agriculture Engineering Journal, 2018; 27(3): 107–115.

Chen Z Y, Guan M, Gao L X, Chen L J, Ma F, Dong H S. Design and test on axial flow peanut picking device with screw bending-tooth. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016; 47(11): 106–113. (in Chinese)

Guan M, Chen Z Y, Gao L X, Liu Z X, Cheng J, Zhang X D. Multifunctional modular full-feeding peanut picking testing device. Transactions of the CSAM, 2015; 46(11): 88–94. (in Chinese)

Wang D W, Shang S Q, Han K. Design and test of 4HJL-2 harvester for peanut picking-up and fruit-picking. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(11): 27–36. (in Chinese)

Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Xu H B, Cao M Z, Yu Z Y, Peng B L. Development of pickup and conveyor device for full-feed peanut pickup harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019; 35(19): 20–28. (in Chinese)

Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Wu F, Yu Z Y, Cao M Z, Gao X M. Modeling and experiment of feeding rate for full-feed peanut pickup harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019; 35(23): 29–36. (in Chinese)

Yuan P F, Han J G. Picking mechanism development of 4HLZ-130 intelligent self-propelled peanut combine harvester. Agricultural Development & Equipment, 2019; 3: 93–94. (in Chinese)

Xu N, Shang S Q, Wang D W, He X N, Gao Z, Liu J Q, et al. Design and research of spike tooth type peanut picking device with longitudinal axial flow. Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2020; 8: 197–201. (in Chinese)

Shang S Q, Li G Y, Yang R B, Sun T Z, Wang Y Y, Lian Z G. Development of 4HQL-2 type whole-feed peanut combine. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009; 25(6): 125–130. (in Chinese)

Zhou D H, Hu Z C, Yu Z Y, Wang B, Cao M Z, Wang S Y. Application situation and development route of the full-feeding peanut stripper. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2017; 2: 246–252. (in Chinese)

Zhang X Y, Han S Y, Liu H, Tang F S, Dong W Z, Xu J, et al. Physiological parameters of high yielding peanut cultivars. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2011; 33(1): 44–47. (in Chinese)

GB/T 5262-2008. Measuring methods for agricultural machinery testing conditions-General rules. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2008. (in Chinese)

NY/T 502-2016 Operating quality for peanut harvesters. Ministry of Agriculture of China, 2016. (in Chinese)

NY/T 993-2006 Operating quality for peanut pickers. Ministry of Agriculture of China, 2006. (in Chinese)

Nuti R C, Holbrook C C, Culbreath A. Peanut peg strength and post harvest pod scavenging for full phenotypic yield over digging date and variety. American peanut research and education society, APRES 2010; 42: 95–96.

Wang C T, Wang Z W, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Tang Y Y, Du Z B, et al. Evaluation of different peanut genotypes for mechanized harvest properties. Journal of Peanut Science, 2019; 48(1): 52–57. (in Chinese)

Yu Z Y, Hu Z C, Cao M Z, Wang S Y, Zhang P, Peng B L. Design of cleaning device of tangential flow and whole-feed peanut combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019; 35(9): 29–37. (in Chinese)

Wang B, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Zhang Y H, Gu F W, Shi L L, et al. Structure operation parameter optimization for elastic steel pole oscillating screen of semi-feeding four rows peanut combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(21): 20–28. (in Chinese)

Zhang X Y, Tang F S, Dong W Z. High-yield cultivation techniques of high-quality peanuts. Zhengzhou: Zhongyuan Farmers Press, 2008; pp: 56–71. (in Chinese)

National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2021/indexch.htm. Accessed on [2022-02-11]




Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office