Pneumatic webbed soft gripper for unstructured grasping

Shibo Cai, Chun’e Tang, Lufeng Pan, Guanjun Bao, Wenyu Bai, Qinghua Yang

Abstract


Grasping unstructured and fragile objects such as food and fruits is a great challenge for robots. Being naturally different from the traditional rigid robot, soft robotics provide highly promising choices with their intrinsic flexibility and compliance to objects. Inspired by duck foot and octopus tentacle, a pneumatic webbed soft gripper was proposed, which is consisted of four multi-chambered fingers and four webs. Due to its silicone body and soft web structure, the developed soft gripper can naturally adapt, grasp and hold delicate and unstructured objects. Compressed air inflated into the three chambers of the finger actuates the silicone body and performs inflection and extension. The silicone web follows the motion of four fingers, forming a semi-closed grasping configuration. The fingers were fabricated with silicone rubber and constraint spring by casting process. The web was cast around the fingers. The inflecting motion was modeled via the pneumatic principle and geometrical analysis. The dynamic properties of the finger were tested by step and sinusoidal signals. And the grasping performances for different objects, such as egg, strawberry, candy, and knife, were also demonstrated by experiments. The proposed soft gripper performed stably in response to a 0.4 Hz reference sinusoidal signal. The bionic structure greatly improves the stability and reliability of grasping, particularly for unstructured and fragile objects. Moreover, the webs ensure the grasping for multiple objects in one snatch, especially suitable for agricultural products and food processing.
Keywords: soft gripper, biomimetics, grasping, robotic, pneumatic
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211404.6388

Citation: Cai S B, Tang C E, Pan L F, Bao G J, Bai W Y, Yang Q H. Pneumatic webbed soft gripper for unstructured grasping. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(4): 145–151.

Keywords


soft gripper, biomimetics, grasping, robotic, pneumatic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bao G J, Fang H, Chen L F, Wan Y H, Xu F, Zhang L B. Soft robotics: Academic insides and perspectives via bibliometric analysis. Soft Robotics, 2018; 5(3): 229–241.

Lee C, Kim M, Kim Y J, Hong N, Ryu S, Kim H J. Soft robot review. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, 2017; 15(1): 3–15.

Paetsch W, Kaneko M. A three fingered, multijointed gripper for experimental use. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Ibaraki, Japan, 1990; 4077014. doi: 10.1109/IROS.1990.262505.

Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H. Applying a flexible microactuator to robotic mechanisms. IEEE Control Systems, 1992; 12(1): 21–27.

Jacobsen S C, Iversen E K, Knutti D F, Johnson R T. Design of the Utah/M.I.T. dextrous hand. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, USA, 1986; pp.1520–1532.

Xu T T, Yu J G, Vong C I, Wang B, Wu X Y, Zhang L. Dynamic morphology and swimming properties of rotating miniature swimmers with soft tails. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(3): 924–934.

Kumar K, Liu J, Christianson C, Ali M, Tolley M T, Aizenberg J. A biologically inspired, functionally graded end effector for soft robotics applications. Soft Robotics, 2017; 4(4): 317–323.

Xu L, Chen H, Zou J, Dong W, Gu G, Zhu L. Bio-inspired annelid robot: A dielectric elastomer actuated soft robot. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2017; 12(2): 025003. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/aa50a5.

Scholz M, Meyer J. Silicone rubber. Patent US9708458B2, USA, 2017.

Sun Y, Song Y S, Paik J. Characterization of silicone rubber based soft pneumatic actuators. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 2013; pp.4446–4453.

Kern M D, Alcaide J O, Rentschler M E. Soft material adhesion characterization for in vivo locomotion of robotic capsule endoscopes: Experimental and modeling results. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2014; 39(1): 257–269.

Yuan H, Yang J W, Zhang N W, Ren J. Tension properties of biodegradable PLA/Ecoflex blend film. Plastics, 2008; 37(6): 48–50.

Schubert D W, Lämmlein M, Hanstein H V. Cyclic loading of model silicone elastomer samples with regard to the failure of silicone breast implants. Polymer Testing, 2018; 66(1): 292–295.

Zhang Z, Ni X Q, Wu H L, Sun M, Bao G J, Wu H P, et al. Pneumatically actuated soft gripper with bistable structures. Soft Robotics, 2021; In press. doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0195.

Walker J, Zidek T, Harbel C, Yoon S, Strickland F S, Kumar S. Soft robotics: A review of recent developments of pneumatic soft actuators. Actuators, 2020; 9(1): 3. doi:10.3390/act9010003.

Ogunmolu O P, Gu X J, Jiang S, Gans N R. Vision-based control of a soft robot for maskless head and neck cancer radiotherapy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Fort Worth, USA, 2016; pp.256–262.

Robertson M A, Sadeghi H, Florez J M, Paik J. Soft pneumatic actuator fascicles for high force and reliability. Soft Robotics, 2017; 4(1): 23–32.

Laschi C, Cianchetti M, Mazzolai B, Margheri L, Follador M, Dario P. Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Advanced Robotics, 2012; 26(7): 709–727.

Calderón A A, Ugalde J C, Zagal J C, Pérez-Arancibia N O. Design, fabrication and control of a multi-material-multi-actuator soft robot inspired by burrowing worms. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Qingdao, China, 2016; pp.31–38.

Caldwell D G, Medrano-Cerda G A, Goodwin M J. Braided pneumatic actuator control of a multi-jointed manipulator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference, Le Touquet, France, 1993; pp.423–428.

Martinez R V, Branch J L, Fish C R, Jin L H, Shepherd R F, Nunes R M D. Robotic tentacles with three-dimensional mobility based on flexible elastomers. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013; 25(2): 205–212.

Tarvainen T V J, Yu W. Preliminary results on multi-pocket pneumatic elastomer actuators for human-robot interface in hand rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics(ROBIO), Zhuhai, China, 2015; pp.2635–2639.

Deimel R, Brock O. A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2013; pp.2047–2053.

Taylor A J, Montayre R, Zhao Z, Kwok K W, Tse Z T H. Modular force approximating soft robotic pneumatic actuator. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2018; 13(11): 1819–1827.

Martinez R V, Fish C R, Chen X, Whitesides G M. Elastomeric origami: Programmable paper‐elastomer composites as pneumatic actuators. Advanced Functional Materials, 2012; 22(7): 1376–1384.

He M H, Song K, Mo H B, Li J, Pan D C, Liang Z Q. Progress on photosensitive resins for 3D printing. Journal of Functional Polymers, 2015; 28(1): 102–108.

Yao P F, Gao T, Bao G J, Li K, Xu Z G, Wang Z H. Structure and bending model of long-arm biomimetic soft robot. Journal of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, 2017; 34(4): 346–350.

Wan W W, Harada K, Kanehiro F. Planning grasps with suction cups and parallel grippers using superimposed segmentation of object meshes. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2020; 99: 1–19.

Yan L, Shen M, Yao W, Lu M Z, Liu L S, Xiao A L. Recognition method of lactating sows' posture based on sensor MPU6050. Transactions of the CSAM, 2015; 46(5): 279–285. (in Chinese)

Wu X Y, Liu J, Huang C Y, Su M, Xu T T. 3-D path following of helical micro-swimmers with an adaptive orientation compensation model. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2020; 17(2): 823–832.




Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office