Modification of perchery system: Preference for ramps rather than ladders during early adaptation period for cage-reared pullets

Hongya Zheng, Baoming Li, Qin Tong, Gang Chen, Xuanyang Li

Abstract


Poor early adaptation in aviaries has adverse effects on welfare and the later production. Effects of system modification by ramps and ladders on early adaptation of birds were investigated. A total of 240 pullets and 24 cockerels of Yukou Jing Pink II parent stock were allocated into six perchery compartments at the age of 83 days from conventional cages. Three compartments were modified with ramps of different angles, 30°, 40° and 30° & 50° combination. The other compartments were fitted with 2 ladders, with 22 cm steps and 33 cm steps. Spatial distribution of birds and eggs, as well as the data of ramps and ladders utilization were used to assess birds’ adaptation and the effectiveness of modification facilities. A higher proportion of hens got onto the tiered platforms in ramp group (p<0.001) and engaged in feeding (p=0.002). Inversely more than 85.0% of hens dwelled on the system floor in the ladder group for the whole observation period. The proportion of birds feeding increased over time (p<0.001), with the proportion of birds lying decreasing (p<0.001). A higher frequency of utilization of ramps was found compared with ladders (4.5-25.8 vs. 2.8-14.7 times/40 birds per hour). For ramp use, 79.3% of hens negotiated level change by using 30° ramp and behavioral process was also found related with the type of ramps. On the contrary, very few successful level changes were observed via ladders and 60% of ladder use was ended with birds backing to the system floor. Besides, a higher proportion of non-nest eggs was recorded in ladder group in the early laying period. These results indicated that modification of ramps is more applicable for improving birds’ early adaptation and later production in perchery system of multi-tier, especially for pullets reared in conventional cages.
Keywords: animal welfare, modification, perchery system, adaptation, pullet, ramp, enriched cage system
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191204.4030

Citation: Zheng H Y, Li B M, Tong Q, Chen G, Li X Y. Modification of perchery system: Preference for ramps rather than ladders during early adaptation period for cage-reared pullets. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(4): 34–42.

Keywords


animal welfare, modification, perchery system, adaptation, pullet, ramp, enriched cage system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appleby M C, Smith S F, Hughes B O. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages: effects of design on behaviour and welfare. Br Poult Sci, 1993; 34(5): 835–847.

Baxter M R. The welfare problems of laying hens in battery cages. Vet Rec, 1994; 134: 614–619.

Abrahamsson P, Tauson R. Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens: Effects on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A-Animal Sciences, 1995; 45(3): 191–203.

Tauson R. Furnished cages and aviaries: Production and health. World's Poult Sci J, 2002; 58(1): 49–63.

Appleby M C. The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: History and prospects. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 2003; 6(2): 103–121.

Directive E U. Council directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1999; L203: 53–57.

Greene J, Cowan T. Table egg production and hen welfare: the UEP-HSUS agreement and HR 3798. Available: http://www.fas.org/sgp/ crs/misc/R42534.pdf.

Campbell D L, Goodwin S L, Makagon M M, Swanson J C, Siegford J M. Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles. Poult Sci, 2016; 95(1): 188–197.

Steenfeldt S, Nielsen B L. Welfare of organic laying hens kept at different indoor stocking densities in a multi-tier aviary system. I: egg laying, and use of veranda and outdoor area. Animal, 2015; 9(9): 1509–1517.

Shields S, Duncan I J H. An HSUS Report: a comparison of the welfare of hens in battery cages and alternative systems. Available: https://animalstudiesrep-ository.org/hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals/18.

Leyendecker M, Hamann H, Hartung J, Kamphues J, Neumann U, Surie C, et al. Keeping laying hens in furnished cages and an aviary housing system enhances their bone stability. Br Poult Sci, 2005; 46(5): 536–544.

Wilkins L J, McKinstry J L, Avery N C, Knowles T G, Brown S N, Tarlton J, et al. Influence of housing system and design on bone strength and keel bone fractures in laying hens. Vet Rec, 2011; 169(16): 414–414.

Colson S, Arnould C, Huonnic D, Michel V. Influence of two rearing systems for pullets, rearing aviaries and furnished floor, on space use and production in laying aviaries. Anim Sci Pap Rep, 2005; 23(S1): 85–93.

Colson S, Arnould C, Michel V. Influence of rearing conditions of pullets on space use and performance of hens placed in aviaries at the beginning of the laying period. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2008; 111(3-4): 286–300.

Brantsæter M, Nordgreen J, Rodenburg T B, Tahamtani F M, Popova A, Janczak A M. Exposure to increased environmental complexity during rearing reduces fearfulness and increases use of three-dimensional space in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Front Vet Sci, 2016; 3: 14.

Casey-Trott T M, Guerin M T, Sandilands V, Torrey S, Widowski T M. Rearing system affects prevalence of keel-bone damage in laying hens: A longitudinal study of four consecutive flocks. Poult Sci, 2017; 96(7): 2029–2039.

Janczak A M, Riber A B. Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poult Sci, 2015; 94(7): 1454–1469.

Tahamtani F M, Nordgreen J, Nordquist R E, Janczak A M. Early life in a barren environment adversely affects spatial cognition in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Front Vet Sci, 2015; 2: 3.

Wichman A, Heikkilä M, Valros A, Forkman B, Keeling L J. Perching behaviour in chickens and its relation to spatial ability. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2007; 105(1-3): 165–179.

Gunnarsson S, Keeling L J, Svedberg J. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 1999; 40(1): 12–18.

Stratmann A, Fröhlich E K F, Gebhardt-Henrich S G, Harlander-Matauschek A, Würbel H, Toscano M J. Modification of aviary design reduces incidence of falls, collisions and keel bone damage in laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2015; 165: 112–123.

Heerkens J L T, Delezie E, Ampe B, Rodenburg T B, Tuyttens F A M. Ramps and hybrid effects on keel bone and foot pad disorders in modified aviaries for laying hens. Poult Sci, 2016; 95(11): 2479–2488.

Pettersson I C, Weeks C A, Nicol C J. The effect of ramp provision on the accessibility of the litter in single and multi-tier laying hen housing. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2017; 186: 35–40.

Pettersson I C, Weeks C A, Norman K I, Nicol C J. The ability of laying

pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour. PeerJ, 2017; 5: e4069.

LeBlanc C, Tobalske B, Bowley S, Harlandermatauschek A. Development of locomotion over inclined surfaces in laying hens. Animal, 2018; 12(3): 585–596.

Zheng H Y, Yang L, Li B M, Zhou B G. Effect of perch provision in rearing cages on pullets’ adaptability to perch system before and after transfer. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018; 34(13): 225–232. (in Chinese)

Carmichael N L, Walker W, Hughes B O. Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: Influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour. Br Poult Sci, 1999; 40(2): 165–176.

Odén K, Keeling L J, Algers B. Behaviour of laying hens in two types of aviary systems on 25 commercial farms in Sweden. Br Poult Sci, 2002; 43(2): 169–181.

Appleby M C, Mench J A, Hughes B O. Poultry behaviour and welfare. Wallingford, U.K., CABI Publishing, 2004.

Schrader L, Müller B. Night-time roosting in the domestic fowl: The height matters. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2009; 121(3-4): 179–183.

Olsson I A, Keeling L J. Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2000; 68(3): 243–256.

Dial K P. Wing-assisted incline running and the evolution of flight. Science, 2003; 299(5605): 402–404.

Dial K P, Jackson B E, Segre P. A fundamental avian wing-stroke

provides a new perspective on the evolution of flight. Nature, 2008; 451(7181): 985–989.

Tobalske B W, Dial K P. Aerodynamics of wing-assisted incline running in birds. J Exp Biol, 2007; 210(10): 1742–1751.

Gunnarsson S, Yngvesson J, Keeling L J, Forkman B. Rearing without early access to perches impairs the spatial skills of laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2000; 67(3): 217–228.

Kozak M, Tobalske B, Martins C, Bowley S, Wuerbel H, Harlander-Matauschek A. Use of space by domestic chicks housed in complex aviaries. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2016: 181: 115–121.

Tanaka T, Hurnik J F. Research Note: The behaviour of young layers during two weeks in aviary and cages. Poult Sci, 1991; 70(2): 404–407.

Tanaka T, Hurnlk J F. Comparison of behaviour and performance of laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poult Sci, 1992; 71(2): 235–243.

Dial K P, Jackson B E. When hatchlings outperform adults: locomotor development in Australian brush turkeys (Alectura lathami, Galliformes). Proc R Soc B, 2010; 278(1712): 1984.

Shinmura T, Eguchi Y, Lietake K, Tanaka T. Behavioral changes in laying hens after introduction to battery cages, furnished cages and an aviary. Anim Sci J, 2006; 77(2): 242–249.

Petek M. The productivity of commercial laying hens housed in battery cage, aviary, perchery and free-range housing systems. In Proceeding of the 22th Worlds Poultry Congress. Istanbul, Turkey, 2004; pp.8–13.




Copyright (c) 2019



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office