Impacts of fuel feeding methods on the thermal and emission performance of modern coal burning stoves

Riaz Ahmad, Yuguang Zhou, Nan Zhao, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott, Harold John Annegarn, Muhammad Sultan, Renjie Dong, Xinxin Ju

Abstract


The extensive use of traditional cooking and heating stoves to meet domestic requirements creates a serious problem of indoor and outdoor air pollution. This study reports the impacts of two fuel feeding methods – front-loading and top-loading on the thermal and emissions performance of a modern coal-fired water-heating and cooking stove using a contextual test sequence that replicates typical patterns of domestic use. Known as a low-pressure boiler, when this stove was fueled with raw coal, the findings indicate that front-loading the fuel, which devolatilizes the new fuel gradually, produced consistently higher space heating efficiency and lower emission factors than top-loading the same stove, which devolatilizes new fuel all at once. Comparing the performance at both high and low power gave the similar results: front-loading with raw coal produced consistently better results than top-loading. The average water heating efficiency when front-loading was (58.6±2.3)% and (53.4±1.8)% for top-loading. Over the sixteen-hour test sequence, front-loading produced 22% lower emissions of PM2.5 (3.9±0.6) mg/MJNET than top-loading (4.7±0.9) mg/MJNET. The same pattern was observed for carbon monoxide and the CO/CO2 ratio. CO was reduced from (5.0±0.4) g/MJNET to (4.1±0.5) g/MJNET. The combustion efficiency (CO/CO2 ratio) improved from (8.2±0.8)% to (6.6±0.6)%. Briquetted semi-coked coal briquettes are promoted as a raw coal substitute, and the tests were replicated using this fuel. Again, the same pattern of improved performance was observed. Front loading produced 3.5% higher heating efficiency, 10% lower CO and a 0.9% lower CO/CO2 ratio. It is concluded that, compared with top loading, the manufacturers recommended front-loading refueling behavior delivered better thermal, emissions and combustion performance under all test conditions with those two fuels.
Keywords: stoves, front-loading, top-loading, refueling, domestic coal, thermal efficiency, PM2.5 emissions, semi-coked coal briquettes
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191203.3880

Citation: Ahmad R, Zhou Y G, Zhao N, Pemberton-Pigott C, Annegarn H J, Sultan M, et al. Impacts of fuel feeding methods on the thermal and emission performance of modern coal burning stoves. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(3): 160–167.

Keywords


stoves, front-loading, top-loading, refueling, domestic coal, thermal efficiency, PM2.5 emissions, semi-coked coal briquettes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hou B D, Tang X, Ma C, Liu L, Wei Y M, Liao H. Cooking fuel choice in rural China: Results from microdata. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017; 142(2): 538–547.

Casillas C E, Kammen D M. The energy-poverty-climate nexus. Science, 2010; 330(6008): 1181–1182.

International Energy Agency, 2002 International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2002. OECD/IEA, Paris.

Department of Energy Statistics of National Bureau of Statistics of China. China energy statistical yearbook of 2012. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2013. (in Chinese)

He B, Liang L, Jiang G. Distributions of arsenic and selenium in selected Chinese coal mines. Science of the Total Environment, 2002; 296(1-3), 19–26.

Liu K. The opportunities and challenges of controlling endemic arsenism in China. Chinese Journal of Endemiology, 2007; 26(1): 4–5. (in Chinese)

Liu W, Shen G, Chen Y, Shen H, Huang Y, Li T, et al. Air pollution and inhalation exposure to particulate matter of different sizes in rural households using improved stoves in central China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2018; 63(1): 87–95.

WHO. 2014. Household air pollution and health. WHO Fact sheet N 292. Updated May 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/household-air-pollution-and-health [accessed on 2019-01-02].

Zhang Y X, Hao J, Zhou Y G, Zhang Z X, Chen L, Dong R J. Assessment of pollutant emissions and energy efficiency of four commercialized charcoal stoves with modified Chinese cooking stove protocol. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(2): 202–207.

Zhi G, Yang J, Zhang T, Guan J, Du J, Xue Z, et al. Rural household coal use survey, emission estimation and policy implications. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2015; 28(8): 1179–1185. (in Chinese)

Chai F, Xu Z, Zhi G, Luo Y, Ren Y, Ye J. Complex control measures of rural coal combustion pollution. Environmental Protection, 2016; 44(6): 15–19. (in Chinese)

Chen N L, Zhang D W, Li Y T, Fan M. Residential emissions in Beijing: about 400 × 104 t. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016; 113(40): 5778–5779.

Dai Q, Bi X, Song W, Li T, Liu B, Ding J, et al. Residential coal combustion as a source of primary sulfate in Xi'an, China. Atmospheric Environment, 2019; 196: 66–76.

Shen G, Lin W, Chen Y, Yue D, Liu Z, Yang C. Factors influencing the adoption and sustainable use of clean fuels and cookstoves in China -A Chinese literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015: 51: 741–750.

Smith K, Gu S, Huang K, Qiu D. One hundred million improved cookstoves in China: How was it done? World Development, 1993; 21(6):941–961.

Beijing Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. General

technical specification of domestic biomass stove/boiler. (DB11/T 540-2008). (in Chinese)

National Standard of the Peoples Republic of China. General administration of quality supervision, test method for household coal and stoves. (GB/T 6412-2009). (in Chinese)

Ministry of Agriculture, Peoples Republic of China. Densified biofuel test methods Part 1: General principles. (NY/T 1881.1-2010). (in Chinese)

National Standard, Peoples Republic of China. Proximate analysis of solid biofuels. (GB/T 28731-2012). (in Chinese)

National Standard, Peoples Republic of China. Determination of carbon and hydrogen in solid biofuel. (GB/T 28734-2012). (in Chinese)

World Bank. 2015. China - Hebei Clean Heating Project (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/ curated/en/902691467992494218/China-Hebei-Clean-Heating-Project. Accessed on [2019-01-12].

Robinson J, Pemberton-Pigott C, Makonese T, Annegarn H. Heterogeneous stove testing protocols for emissions and thermal performance. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Domestic Use of Energy, Cape Town, March 29-31, 2010; pp.41-48.

Li Q, Jiang J, Qi J, Deng J, Yang D, Wu J, et al. Improving the energy efficiency of stoves to reduce pollutant emissions from household solid fuel combustion in China. Environmental Science Technology Letters, 2016; 3(10): 369−374.

MacCarty N, Ogle D, Still D, Bond T, Roden C, Willson B. Laboratory comparison of the global-warming potential of six categories of biomass cooking stoves. Aprovecho Research Center, Oregon: Creswell; 2007.

Arora P, Jain S. Estimation of organic and elemental carbon emitted from wood burning in traditional and improved cookstoves using controlled cooking test. Environmental Science Technology, 2015; 49(6): 3958–3965.

MacCarty N, Ogle D, Still D, Bond T, Roden C. A laboratory comparison of the global warming impact of five major types of biomass cooking stoves. Energy Sustainable Development, 2008; 12(2): 56–65.

Venkataraman C, Habib G, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Miguel A H, Friedlander S K. Residential biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science, 2005; 307(5714): 1454–1456.

Makonese T. Heterogeneous stove testing methods for the evaluation of domestic solid-fuel cookstoves. International Energy Journal, 2018; 18: 191–206.




Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office