Reducing feather pecking and cloacal cannibalism by providing layer breeders with nest boxes in colony cages for natural mating

Haipeng Shi, Weichao Zheng, Jiang Tu, Baoming Li

Abstract


Colony cages for natural mating have been applied on many layer breeder farms. However, feather pecking and cloacal cannibalism are considered as prominent problems for these systems. This study aimed to investigate the effects on feather pecking and vent pecking behaviors by providing layer breeders with nest boxes (0.90 m L × 0.40 m W × 0.60 m H) in colony cages for natural mating (4.80 m L × 1.20 m W × 0.71 m H). Video recording and artificial observation were adopted. The results showed that the usage of nest boxes gradually increased from the beginning of nest boxes providing at the age of 37 weeks to the end of the experiment at the age of 55 weeks. The utilization rates of nest boxes were 36.75%, 44.75% and 50.38% at the ages of 41 weeks, 47 weeks and 53 weeks, respectively. The hens in the cages without nest boxes showed significantly more frequent gentle feather pecks (both given and received) than hens in the cages with nest boxes at the ages of 41 weeks, 47 weeks and 53 weeks. A decreasing trend of gentle feather pecking frequency (both given and received) was found with the increasing age for both the two groups. No significant difference was found in the number of given or received severe feather pecks at the age of 41 weeks. The hens in the cages without nest boxes showed a significantly higher frequency of given and received severe feather pecks than hens in the cages with nest boxes at the ages of 47 weeks and 53 weeks (p<0.05). Both cannibalistic injury occurrence and mortality rate in the cages with nest boxes were significantly lower than those in the cages without nest boxes. In conclusion, providing nest boxes in colony cages for natural mating could decrease abnormal pecking behaviors and improve animal welfare conditions of layer breeders.
Keywords: feather pecking, vent pecking, nest box, colony cage, cloacal cannibalism, layer breeder, animal welfare
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20181106.3323

Citation: Shi H P, Zheng W C, Tu J, Li B M. Reducing feather pecking and cloacal cannibalism by providing layer breeders with nest boxes in colony cages for natural mating. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(6): 27–32.

Keywords


feather pecking, vent pecking, nest box, colony cage, cloacal cannibalism, layer breeder, animal welfare

Full Text:

PDF

References


Pötzsch C J, Lewis K, Nicol C J, Green LE. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of vent pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with feather pecking, management and disease. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2001; 74(4): 259–272.

Rodenburg T B, Koene P. Comparison of individual and social feather pecking tests in two lines of laying hens at ten different ages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2003; 81(2): 133–148.

Allen J, Perry G C. Feather pecking and cannibalism in a caged layer flock. British Poultry Science, 1975; 16(5): 441–451.

Savory C J. Feather pecking and cannibalism. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 1995; 51(2): 215–219.

Duncan I J H, Wood-Gush D G M. Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour, 1971; 19(3): 500–504.

Rodenburg T B, Komen H, Ellen E D, Uitdehaag K A, Arendonk J A. Selection method and early-life history affect behavioural development, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008; 110(3): 217–228.

Rodenburg T B, Koene P. The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2007; 103(3-4): 205–214.

Blokhuis H J, Arkes J G. Some observations on the development of feather-pecking in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1984; 12(1-2): 145–157.

Lambton S L, Knowles T G, Yorke C, Nicol C J. The risk factors affecting the development of vent pecking and cannibalism in free-range and organic laying hens. Animal Welfare, 2015; 24(1): 101–111.

Lambton S L, Knowles T G, Yorke C, Nicol C J. The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2010; 123(1-2): 32–42.

Nicol C J, Bestman M, Gilani A M, Haas E N D, Jong I C D, Lambton S, et al. The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2013; 69(4): 775–788.

Freire R, Eastwood M A, Joyce M. Minor beak trimming in chickens leads to loss of mechanoreception and magnetoreception. Journal of Animal Science, 2011; 89(4): 1201–1206.

Mohammed H H, Grashorn M A, Bessei W. The effects of lighting conditions on the behaviour of laying hens. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 2010; 74(3): 197–202.

Prescott N B, Wathes C M, Jarvis J R. Light, vision and the welfare of poultry. Animal Welfare, 2003; 12(2): 269–288.

Yngvesson J, Keeling L J, Newberry R C. Individual production differences do not explain cannibalistic behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 2004; 45(4): 453–462.

Gunnarsson S, Keeling L J, Svedberg J. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. British Poultry Science, 1999; 40(1): 12–8.

Bilcík B, Keeling L J. Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 1999; 40(4): 444–451.

Weeks C A, Nicol C J. Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 2006; 62(2): 296–307.

Cooper J J, Appleby M C. Demand for nest boxes in laying hens. Behavioural Processes, 1996; 36(2): 171–182.

Cooper J J, Appleby M C. The value of environmental resources to domestic hens: a comparison of the work-rate for food and for nests as a function of time. Animal Welfare, 2003; 12(1): 39–52.

Cooper J J, Albentosa M J. Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian & Poultry Biology Reviews, 2003; 14(3): 127–149.

Cronin G M, Butler K L, Desnoyers M A, Barnett J L, Witkowski A. The use of nest boxes by hens in cages: what does it mean for welfare? Animal Science Papers & Reports, 2005; 23(1): 121–128.

Wall H. Production performance and proportion of nest eggs in layer hybrids housed in different designs of furnished cages. Poultry Science, 2011; 90(10): 2153–2161.

Rietveld P B, Blokhuisb H J, Wiepkemaa P R. Egg-laying behaviour and nest-site selection of domestic hens kept in small floor-pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1985; 14(1): 75–88.

Haas E N D, Bolhuis J E, Kemp B, Groothuis T G G, Rodenburg T B. Parents and early life environment affect behavioral development of laying hen chickens. PLoSOne, 2014; 9(3): e90577.

Gao W, Jjr F, Robinson F E, Cook H. Effect of stocking density on the incidence of usage of enrichment devices by white Leghorn hens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 1994; 3(4): 336–341.

Chow A, Hogan J A. The development of feather pecking in Burmese red jungle fowl: The influence of early experience with exploratory-rich environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2005; 93(3) :283–294.

Appleby M C, Hughes B O, Elson H A. Poultry production systems: Behaviour, management and welfare. Livestock Production Science, 1993; 36(2): 196–197.

Roper T J, Marples N M. Colour preferences of domestic chicks in relation to food and water presentation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1997; 54(2): 207–213.

RiberA B. Development with age of nest box use and gregarious nesting in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2010; 123(1): 24–31.

Wall H, Tauson R, Elwinger K E. Effect of nest design, passages, and hybrid on use of nest and production performance of layers in furnished cages. Poultry Science, 2002; 81(3): 333–339.

Hori H, Kamei I. Research on time of contraction of the cloaca after oviposition. Japanese Poultry Science, 1986; 23: 379–380.

Appleby M C, Duncan I J H, McRae H E. Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: Experimental results and their commercial application. British Poultry Science, 1988; 29(2): 351–357.

Huber-Eicher B. The effect of early colour preference and of a colour exposing procedure on the choice of nest colours in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2004; 86(1-2): 63–76.




Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office