Design of a flexible end-effector based on characteristics of tomatoes

Kehong Zhou, Liru Xia, Jun Liu, Mingyan Qian, Jie Pi

Abstract


The end-effector is the last executing part of the interaction between robots and fruits. In this paper, the physical characteristics of tomatoes and the tomato end-effector of the fluidic elastomer actuator type were studied. There was no correlation between the test point, the mass, the size and the rupture force of tomatoes. The non-destructive clamping force of tomatoes was 11.13 N. There were statistically significant correlations between the number of finger chambers, the transverse diameter of tomatoes, the inflation pressure and the clamping force. The inflation pressure and the size of tomatoes were directly proportional to the clamping force. Since fingers with more chambers had higher flexibility, the number of chambers was inversely proportional to the slope of the horizontal force-pressure curve, and the number of chambers was directly proportional to the angle between the total clamping force and the horizontal direction. A flexible end-effector was designed by genetic algorithm according to the physical characteristics of tomatoes and the simulation results of the finger of the end-effector. The test results of the end-effector showed that the tomatoes would be successfully clamped by the end-effector composed of three four-chamber fingers in a static situation with the inflation pressure less than the optimized inflation pressure (28.293 kPa). When in a dynamic situation, the success rate of tomatoes being clamped by the end-effector with an inflation pressure of 29 kPa was 97%. The tomatoes in the static clamping test and the dynamic clamping test were not damaged.
Keywords: end-effector, fluid elastomer actuator, non-destructive, flexible, Genetic Algorithm, characteristics of tomatoes
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221502.6672

Citation: Zhou K H, Xia L R, Liu J, Qian M Y, Pi J. Design of a flexible end-effector based on characteristics of tomatoes. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(2): 13–24.

Keywords


end-effector, fluid elastomer actuator, non-destructive, flexible, genetic algorithm, characteristics of tomatoes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wang T, Ye H, Zheng J, Li M. Research progress of main flavor compounds in tomato fruits. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020; 32(8): 1513–1522. (in Chinese)

Ullah I, Mao H, Zhang C, Javed Q, Azeem A. Optimization of irrigation and nutrient concentration based on economic returns, substrate salt accumulation and water use efficiency for tomato in greenhouse. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2017; 63(2): 1748–1762.

Owusu J, Ma H, Wang Z, Afoakwah N A, Amissah A. Volatile profiles of tomato wine before and after ageing. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, 2014; 8(2): 129–142.

Du R, Kou Y, Zhu L. Bibliometric analysis of literature in Chinese Core Journals from 1999 to 2019 with tomato as research topics and hotspots. China Vegetables, 2020; 11: 85–91. (in Chinese)

Liu C, Han X, Cai L, Lu X, Ying T, Jiang Z. Postharvest UV-B irradiation maintains sensory qualities and enhances antioxidant capacity in tomato fruit during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2011; 59(3): 232–237.

Wang Q, Wang J, Su X, Li W, Cao J, Jin K, et al. Evaluation and selection experiment of tomato varieties in dryland. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2020; 48(8): 1247–1249, 1297. (in Chinese)

Shang L, Song J, Wang J, Zang Y, Ye Z. Research progress on quality formation and molecular mechanism of tomato fruit. China Vegetables, 2019; 04: 21–28. (in Chinese)

Preter A D, Anthonis J, Baerdemaeker J D. Development of a robot for harvesting strawberries. IFAC PapersOnLine, 2018; 51(17): 14–19.

Chen Z, Jiang S, Sun Y. Development status of agroforestry harvesting robots. Agricultural Engineering, 2019; 9(02): 10–18. (in Chinese)

Wang G, Yu Y, Feng Q. Design of end-effector for tomato robotic harvesting. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016; 49(16): 190–193.

Wang X, Wu P, Feng Q, Wang G. Design and test of tomatoes harvesting robot. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016; 38(4): 94–98. (in Chinese)

Yaguchi H, Nagahama K, Hasegawa T, Inaba M. Development of an autonomous tomato harvesting robot with rotational plucking gripper. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016; pp.652–657.

Chen Z, Yang M, Li Y, Yang L. Design and experiment of tomato picking end-effector based on non-destructive pneumatic clamping control. Transactions of the CSAE, 2021; 37(2): 27–35. (in Chinese)

Stephen L, Everett C, Lopes M M, Christopher B. Stronger at depth: jamming grippers as deep sea sampling tools. Soft Robotics, 2017; 4(4): 305–316.

Brown E, Rodenberg N. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010; 107(44): 18809–18814.

John A, Hod L. The JamHand: dexterous manipulation with minimal actuation. Soft Robotics, 2017; 4(1): 70–80.

Tomokazu T, Kikuchi S, Suzuki M, Aoyagi S. Vacuum gripper imitated octopus sucker-effect of liquid membrane for absorption. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2015; pp.2929–2936.

Song S, Sitti M. Soft grippers using micro-fibrillar adhesives for transfer printing. Advanced Materials, 2014; 26(28): 4901–4906.

Suresh S A, Christensen D L, Hawkes E W, Cutkosky M. Surface and shape deposition manufacturing for the fabrication of a curved surface gripper. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2015; 7(2): 1–7.

Glick P, Suresh S A, Ruffatto III D, Cutkosky M, Tolley M T, Parness A. A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018; 3(2): 903–910.

Wilson M. Festo drives automation forwards. Assembly Automation, 2011; 31(1): 12–16.

Crooks W, Rozen-Levy S, Trimmer B, Rogers C, Messner W. Passive gripper inspired by Manduca sexta and the Fin Ray effect. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2017; 14(4): 1–7.

Crooks W, Vukasin G, O’Sullivan M, Messner W, Rogers C. Fin ray effect inspired soft robotic gripper: from the robosoft grand challenge toward optimization. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2016; 3: 70. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00070.

Hemming J, van Tuijl B A J, Gauchel W, Wais E. Field test of different end-effectors for robotic harvesting of sweet-pepper. Acta Horticulturae, 2016; 1130: 567–574.

Hemming J, Bac W C, van Tuijl B A J, Barth R, Bontsema J, Pekkeriet E, et al. A robot for harvesting sweet-pepper in greenhouses. International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, Zurich, July 6-10, 2014; pp.1-8. Paper No. C0114

Preter A D, Anthonis J, Baerdemaeker J D. Development of a robot for harvesting strawberries. ScienceDirect, 2018; 51(17): 14–19.

Shintake J, Cacucciolo V, Floreano D, Shea H. Soft robotic grippers. Advanced Materials, 2018; 30(29): 1707035. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707035.

Chen Y, Guo S, Li C, Yang H, Hao L. Size recognition and adaptive grasping using an integration of actuating and sensing soft pneumatic gripper. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2018; 104: 14–24.

Lu W, Wang P, Wang L, Deng Y. Design and experiment of flexible gripper for mushroom non-destructive picking. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020; 51(11): 28–36. (in Chinese)

Li Z, Liu J, Li P. Relationship between mechanical property and damage of tomato during robot harvesting. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010; 26(5): 112–116. (in Chinese)

Al-Rubaiai M, Pinto T, Qian C, Tan X. Soft actuators with stiffness and shape modulation using 3D-printed conductive polylactic acid material. Soft Robotics, 2019; 6(3): 1–15.




Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office