Humic acids derived from Leonardite to improve enzymatic activities and bioavailability of nutrients in a calcareous soil

Qian Sun, Jianlong Liu, Lianfei Huo, Yuncong C Li, Xue Li, Liru Xia, Zhongkai Zhou, Meina Zhang, Bin Li

Abstract


Understanding the role of humic substances in soils is important for developing and utilizing organic fertilizers or soil amendments for sustainable agriculture. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different fractions of humic acids derived from Leonardite on enzymatic activities and bioavailability of nutrients in a soil. The experiment was carried out by mixing different factions of humic acids with a soil and incubated for 70 d. The treatments included five factions of humic acids (HS1 (low molecular weight), HS2 (medium molecular weight), HS3 (large molecular weight, SED (sediment of fractions), HS (mixture of HS1, HS2, and HS3)), raw Leonardite (IM) and a control (no addition of humic acid). Experimental results showed that application of humic acids significantly improved acid and alkaline phosphatase activities, especially with HS1. Humic substances with high molecular weights significantly inhibit urease activity, and the optimal application rate was 600 kg/hm2 of humic substances with the high molecular weights. Concentrations of NH4+-N were decreased with increasing humus applications. All treatments (HSmix, HS1, HS2, HS3, IM, SED) did not affect the soil contents of Ca, although soil concentrations of K, P, Cu, Zn were increase significantly when small molecular weight humus (HS1) was applied.
Keywords: humic acid, molecular weight, Leonardite, enzyme, nutrient content
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20201303.

Citation: Sun Q, Liu J L, Huo L F, Li Y C, Li X, Xia L R, et al. Humic acids derived from Leonardite to improve enzymatic activities and bioavailability of nutrients in a calcareous soil. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 200–205.

Keywords


humic acid, molecular weight, Leonardite, enzyme, nutrient content

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen Y, Clapp C, Magen H. Mechanisms of plant growth stimulation by humic substances: The role of organo-iron complexes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2004; 50: 1089–1095.

Hussein K, Fawy H A. Effect of different levels humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Res, 2011; 6: 21–29.

Haghighi M, Nikbakht A, Xia Y P, Pessarakli M. Influence of humic acid in diluted nutrient solution on growth, nutrient efficiency, and postharvest attributes of gerbera. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2014; 45: 177–188.

Hernandez O L, Calderín A, Huelva R, Martínez-Balmori D, Guridi F, Aguiar N O, et al. Humic substances from vermicompost enhance urban lettuce production. Agron Sustain Dev, 2015; 35; 225–232.

Jones C A, Jacobsen J S, Mugaas A. Effect of low-rate commercial humic acid on phosphorus availability, micronutrient uptake, and spring wheat yield. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2007; 38: 921–933.

Lee C-H, Shin H-S, Kang K-H. Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of peat moss and its different humic fractions (Humin, Humic acid and fulvic acid). J Soil Groundw Environ, 2004; 9: 42–51

Sharif M, Khattak R A, Sarir M S. Effect of different levels of lignitic coalderived humic acid on growth of maize plants. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2002; 33: 3567–3580.

Suh H Y, Yoo K S, Suh S G. Tuber growth and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by foliar or soil application of fulvic and humic acids. Hortic Environ Biotechnol, 2014; 55: 183–189.

Li H, Li Y, Li C. Characterization of humic acids and fulvic acids derived from sewage sludge. Asian journal of chemistry, 2013; 25:18.

Schnitzer M. Significance of soil organic matter in soil formation, transport processes in soils and in the formation of soil structure. Soil Utilization and Soil Fertility, Volume 4, Humus Budget, 1992; 206: 63–81.

Kerc A, Bekbolet M, Saatci A M. Effects of oxidative treatment techniques on molecular size distribution of humic acids. Water science and technology, 2004; 49(4): 7–12.

Alireza N, Maryam K. Effect of soil application of humic acid on nutrients uptake, essential oil and chemical compositions of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under greenhouse conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2018; 24(3): 423–431.

Skybová M, Turčániová Ľ, Čuvanová S, Zubrik A, Hudymáčová Ľ. Mechanochemical activation of humic acids in the brown coal. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2007; 434–435, 842–845.

Arslan G, Edebali S, Pehlivan E. Physical and chemical factors affecting the adsorption of Cr (VI) via humic acids extracted from brown coals. Desalination, 2010; 255: 117–123.

Hasan H S. Correction to sorption of radioactive cobalt onto nano calcium silicate/CuO composite modifed by humic acid. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2019; 321: 403–404.

Liu X, Chen Y, Chi Y, Guo Z, Cai L. Effect of pH, ionic strength, foreign ions, humic acid and temperature on sorption of radionuclide 60Co(II) on illite. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 2012; 292: 1357–1366.

Zhang X, Zhang P, Wu Z, Zhang L, Zeng G, Zhou C. Adsorption of methylene blue onto humic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp, 2013; 435: 85–90.

Nannipieri P, Sequi P, Fusi P. Humus and enzyme activity. In: Piccolo A (ed) Humic substances in terrestrial ecosystems. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1996; pp 293–328.

Fernández-Escobar R, Benlloch M, Barranco D, Dueñas A, GutérrezGañán J A. Response of olive trees to foliar application of humic substances extracted from leonardite. Scientia Horticulturae, 1996; 66: 191–200.

Zhang L, Yao X, Yue C, Guan J. Influence of temperature changes on behaviors of large prestressed concrete inverted siphon. North Water Transfers and Water Science and Technology, 2013; 11(4): 196–198. (in Chinese)

Bremner J M, Douglas L A. Effects of some urease inhibitors on urea hydrolysis in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1973; 37(2): 225–226.

Zantua M I, Bremner J M. Comparison of methods of assaying urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 1975; 7: 291–295.

Tabatabai M A, Bremner J M. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem, 1969; 1: 301–307.

Eivazi F, Tabatabai M A. Phosphatases in soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 1977; 9: 167–172.

Browman M G, Tabatabai M A. Phosphodiesterase activity of soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1978; 42: 284–290.

Arancon N, Edwards C, Lee S, Byrne R. Effects of humic acids from vermicomposts on plant growth. European Journal of Soil Biology,2006; 42: S65–S69.

Steven D A. Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability implications for ecosystem processes. Biogeochemistry, 2006; 81: 361–373.

Wallace A J, Armstrong R D, Grace P R, Scheer C, Partington D L. Nitrogen use efficiency of 15N urea applied to wheat based on fertilizer timing and use of inhibitors. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2020; 116: 41–56.

Ahmad F, Kelso W. Pyrophosphate as a source of phosphorus: Hydrolysis under different conditions. J Res (Science), 2001; 12: 130–139.




Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office