Laboratory assessment of the effects of straw mulch on soil compaction under static and dynamic loads

Xianliang Wang, Mingyue Bai, Jin He, Xiangcai Zhang, Kaihua Liu, Lei Liu, Shang Gao, Hong Hu, Jiangtao Ji

Abstract


While straw mulching has been recognized for mitigating compaction, the multifactorial effects of straw parameters (content, length, laying modes) under static versus dynamic loads remain poorly quantified. Straw mulching may alter the stress transfer in the soil when applying static or dynamic loads. This study systematically evaluated stress and energy dissipation mechanisms using laboratory simulations: a plate sinkage test and an adapted Proctor test. The results demonstrated that the straw content (0-20 Mg/hm2) dominantly governs dissipation efficiency, with maximum stress dissipation ratios of 45.6% (static load >200 kPa) and energy dissipation ratios of 38.64% (dynamic high-energy). Longer straw (0.20 m) and ordered laying modes enhanced stress dispersion only under low static loads, while dynamic loads exhibited weaker dissipation. The study reveals that the damping effect of straw is strongest under low stress static load, so it is necessary to reduce the compaction of agricultural machinery and optimize the allocation of straw, such as 15-20 Mg/hm2, to alleviate compaction in clay loam soils. These findings can provide actionable insights for designing straw-based soil conservation strategies and improving compaction prediction models in mechanized agriculture.
Key words: adapted Proctor test; agricultural engineering; soil compaction; straw mulching; stress dissipation
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251802.9315

Citation: Wang X L, Bai M Y, He J, Zhang X C, Liu K H, Liu L, et al. Laboratory assessment of the effects of straw mulch on soil compaction under static and dynamic loads. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2025; 18(2): 21–26.

Keywords


adapted Proctor test; agricultural engineering; soil compaction; straw mulching; stress dissipation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Reichert J M, Suzuki L E A S, Reinert D J, Horn R, Håkansson I. Reference bulk density and critical degree-of-compactness for no-till crop production in subtropical highly weathered soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 2009; 102(2): 242–254.

Guedes Filho O, Da Silva A P, Giarola N F B, Tormena C A. Structural properties of the soil seedbed submitted to mechanical and biological chiseling under no-tillage. Geoderma, 2013; 204-205: 94–101.

Peralta G, Alvarez C R, Taboada M Á. Soil compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas region of Argentina: A meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021; 211: 105022.

Gupta S C, Schneider E C, Larson W E, Hadas A. Influence of corn residue on compression and compaction behavior of soils. Soil Science Soc of Amer J, 1987; 51(1): 207–212.

Soane B D. The role of organic matter in soil compactibility: A review of some practical aspects. Soil and Tillage Research, 1990; 16(1-2): 179–201.

Cherubin M R, Karlen D L, Franco A L C, Tormena C A, Cerri C E P, Davies C A, et al. Soil physical quality response to sugarcane expansion in Brazil. Geoderma, 2016; 267: 156–168.

Holthusen D, Brandt A A, Reichert J M, Horn R, Fleige H, Zink A. Soil functions and in situ stress distribution in subtropical soils as affected by land use, vehicle type, tire inflation pressure and plant residue removal. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018; 184: 78–92.

Gmach M R, Scarpare F V, Cherubin M R, Lisboa I P, Dos Santos A K B, Cerri C E P, et al. Sugarcane straw removal effects on soil water storage and drainage in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019; 74(5): 466–476.

Ruiz Corrêa S T, Barbosa L C, Menandro L M S, Scarpare FV, Reichardt K, De Moraes L O, et al. Straw removal effects on soil water dynamics, soil temperature, and sugarcane yield in South-Central Brazil. Bioenerg Res, 2019; 12(4): 749–763.

Das A, Layek J, Idapuganti R G, Basavaraj S, Lal R, Rangapp K, et al. Conservation tillage and residue management improves soil properties under a upland rice–rapeseed system in the subtropical eastern Himalayas. Land Degrad Dev, 2020; 31(14): 1775–1791.

Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2009; 28(3): 139–163.

Blanco-Canqui H, Ruis S J. No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma, 2018; 326: 164–200.

Sun W, Canadell J G, Yu L, Yu L, Zhang W, Smith P, et al. Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture. Global Change Biology, 2020; 26(6): 3325–3335.

Braida J A, Reichert J M, Veiga M D, Reinert D J. Resíduos vegetais na superfície e carbono orgânico do solo e suas relações com a densidade máxima obtida no ensaio proctor. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo, 2006; 30(4): 605–614.

Reichert J M, Brandt A A, Rodrigues M F, Reinert D J, Braida J A. Load dissipation by corn residue on tilled soil in laboratory and field-wheeling conditions: Lab and field load dissipation by soil surface mulch. J Sci Food Agric, 2016; 96(8): 2705–2714.

Cherubin M R, Franchi M R A, Lima RP, Moraes M T D, Luz F B D. Sugarcane straw effects on soil compaction susceptibility. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021; 212: 105066.

Dawidowski J B, Morrison Jr J E, Snieg M. Measurement of soil layer strength with plate sinkage and uniaxial confined methods. Transactions of the ASAE, 2001; 44(5). DOI: 10.13031/2013.6427.

Raghavan G S V E, Amir M I, Chasse M, Broughton R S. Prediction of soil compaction due to off-road vehicle traffic. Transactions of the ASAE, 1976; 19(4): 610–613.

Aragón A, Garcı́a M G, Filgueira R R, Pachepsky YaA. Maximum compactibility of Argentine soils from the Proctor test: The relationship with organic carbon and water content. Soil and Tillage Research, 2000; 56(3): 197–204.

Jjagwe P, Tekeste M Z, Alkhalifa N, Way TR. Modeling tire-soil compression resistance on artificial soil using the scaling law of pressure-soil sinkage relationship. Journal of Terramechanics, 2023; 108: 7–19.

Bahrami M, Naderi-Boldaji M, Ghanbarian D, Keller T. Simulation of soil stress under plate sinkage loading: A comparison of finite element and discrete element methods. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022; 223: 105463.

Mazurana M, Levien R, Zulpo L, Passos G M, Kerpen H S. Dynamic of pressure-deformation curve in uniaxial compression test in different load times. Eng Agríc, 2017; 37(5): 973–986.

Burt E C, Wood R K, Bailey A C. Effects of dynamic load on normal soil-tire interface stresses. Transactions of the ASAE, 1990; 32(6): 1843.

Lima R P, Keller T. Soil stress measurement by load cell probes as influenced by probe design, probe position, and soil mechanical behaviour. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021; 205: 104796.

He T, Ding Q, Li Y, He R, Xue J, Qiu W. Stress transmission coefficient: A soil stress transmission property for a loading process. Soil and Tillage Research, 2017; 166: 179–184.

Liu F, Zhang J, Chen J. Modeling of flexible wheat straw by discrete element method and its parameters calibration. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(3): 42–46.

Masłowski M, Miedzianowska J, Strzelec K. The potential application of cereal straw as a bio-filler for elastomer composites. Polym Bull, 2020; Apr;77(4): 2021–38.

Liu L, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhong X, Wei Z, Geng Y, et al. Determination and verification of parameters for the discrete element modelling of single disc covering of flexible straw with soil. Biosystems Engineering, 2023; 233: 151–167.

Alemdar A, Sain M. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues – Wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresource Technology, 2008; 99(6): 1664–1671.

Silva R B D, Iori P, Souza Z M D, Pereira D D M G, Vischi Filho O J, Silva F A D M. Contact pressures and the impact of farm equipment on Latosol with the presence and absence of sugarcane straw. Ciênc Agrotec, 2016; 40(3): 265–278.

Hashash Y M A, Whittle A J. Mechanisms of load transfer and arching for braced excavations in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2002; 128(3): 187–197.

Horn R, Way T, Rostek J. Effect of repeated tractor wheeling on stress/strain properties and consequences on physical properties in structured arable soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 2003; 73(1-2): 101–106.




Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office