Development and performance test of a mechanical rice weeder attached to a narrow steel-wheeled tractor

Chaiya Jantra, Watcharachan Sukcharoenvipharat, Prathuang Usaborisut, Pawin Thanpattranon, Wanrat Abdullakasim

Abstract


A narrow steel-wheeled tractor was modified from a conventional rubber tire-wheeled tractor to facilitate the attachment of a chemical sprayer for paddy field use. A mechanical rice weeder was designed to attach to the tractor’s three-point hitch system, aiming to minimize environmental impacts. The developed mechanical weeder, 2 m wide×1.2 m long×1 m high, was attached to a narrow steel wheel tractor. It was designed to operate in 30-cm row spacing, working seven rows simultaneously. In the test results from 2, 40, and 60-day-old rice plants, the field capacities were 0.29, 0.29, and 0.35 hm2/h, resulting in 49.88%, 41.83%, and 44.62% field efficiencies, respectively. The weeding efficiencies were 61.36%, 63.68%, and 86.03%, while the average plant damage factors were 10.38%, 7.51%, and 4.85%, respectively. The fuel consumption was 7.02, 7.44, and 7.06 L/hm2, respectively. The slippage of the tractor was relatively high, at 27.33% and 27.12% for the 20- and 40-day-old rice plants, but was reduced to 10.56% after increasing the contact area of the narrow steel wheels for the 60-day-old rice plants. The performance index 1038.41 for the 60-day-old rice plants was the highest, attributed to a higher forward speed, compared to 305.84 for the 20-day-old and 460.33 for the 40-day-old rice plants.
Key words: mechanical weeder; narrow steel wheel tractor; rice weeding
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251802.8309

Citation: Jantra C, Sukcharoenvipharat W, Usaborisut P, Thanpattranon P, Abdullakasim W. Development and performance
test of a mechanical rice weeder attached to a narrow steel-wheeled tractor. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2025; 18(2): 165–168.

Keywords


mechanical weeder; narrow steel wheel tractor; rice weeding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE). Journal of Agricultural Economics. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand, 2022; pp.56. https://www.oae. go.th/assets/portals/1/files/journal/2566/OAE 795Web.pdf. Accessed on [2023-03-20]

Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M, Islam M N, Ahamed K U, Nahar K. Performance of four irrigated rice varieties under different levels of salinity stress. Int J of Integrative Biology, 2009; 6: 85–90.

Haq K A, Islam M D. Performance of indigenous hand weeders in Bangladesh, Agric. Mechanization in Asia, Afr. Latin Am., 1985; 4: 47–50.

Ratnaweera A, Rajapakse N, Ranasinghe C, Thennakoon T, Kumara R, Balasooriya C K, et al. Design of power weeder for low-land paddy cultivation. International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, Kandy, 2013. Accessed on [2010-13-14]

Parida B C. Development and evaluation of star-cum conoweeder for rice. Agric. Mechanization in Asia, Afr. Latin Am., 2002; 33(3): 21–22.

Gite L P, Yadav B G. Optimum handle height for a push-pull type manually operated dry land weeder. Ergonomics, 1990; 33(12): 1487–1494.

Kumar V J F, Durairaj C D, Salokhe V M. Ergonomic evaluation of hand weeder operation using simulated actuary motion. Int. Agric. Eng. J., 2000; 9(1): 29–39.

Manuwa S I, Odubanjo O O, Malumi B O, Olofinkua S G. Development and performance evaluation of a row-crop mechanical weeder. J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2009; 4(4): 236–239.

Fazlollah E C, Bahrami H, Asakereh A. Evaluation of traditional, mechanical and chemical weed control methods in rice fields. AJCS, 2001; 5: 1007–1013.

Victor V M, Verma A. Design and development of power-operated rotary weeder for wetland paddy. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 2003; 34(4): 27–29.

Keshavalu, Patil B, Raghavendra V, Khan S. Performance evaluation of wet land power weeder for paddy. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 2017; 18: 1–8. DOI: 10.9734/AJAEES/2017/34910.

Ragesh T, Jogdand S, Victor V. Field Performance Evaluation of Power Weeder for Paddy Crop. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 2018; 6: 441–448.

Usaborisut P, Sukcharoenvipharat W, Thanpattranon P. Development and evaluation of a pulling-type mechanical weeder for paddy fields. IAEJ, 2017; 26(4): 33–37.

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Regional Network for Agricultural Machinery. RNAM Test Codes & Procedures for Farm Machinery, Technical Series No. 12, 1983.

Remesan R, Roopesh M S, Remya N, Preman P S. Wetland paddy weeding-A comprehensive comparative study from south india. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript PM 07 011. Vol. IX, 2007.

Gupta C P. Report on weeders. Regional Network for Agricultural Machinery, Manila, Philippines, 1981.

Hegazy R A, Abdelmotaleb I A, Emara Z M, Okasha M H. Development and evaluation of small-scale power weeder. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 2014; 31: 703–728.

Mohan S, Sanjana G K, Kumar D A. Evaluation of performance parameters of power weeder. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 2019; 7: 1760–1764.




Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office