Effects of flight parameters for plant protection UAV on droplets deposition rate based on a 3D simulation approach

Lifeng Xu, Zhongzhu Yang, Zusheng Huang, Weilong Ding, Gerhard Buck-Sorlin

Abstract


With the development of aviation agricultural technology, the number of farmers adopting the use of drones in daily agricultural activities is growing rapidly in recent decades. Among these, a large portion constitutes agricultural drones being used in pest control and crop protection practices, e.g. agriculture spraying of pesticides. Spraying pesticides with drones have proven to be faster than other traditional methods. On the downside, flight time and range of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) are often limited. Thus, a proper arrangement of flight height and velocity will greatly improve spraying efficiency. A new strategy to optimize the flight parameters, i.e. flight height and flight velocity, for fixed-wing UAV with a 3D simulation-based approach together with an automatic optimization algorithm was proposed in this study. To find the optimal parameters for a UAV to fly and spray under certain environmental conditions, a three-dimensional model of the target crop was established first, followed by a detailed simulation of droplet spraying. As a demonstration case, a grass model was developed and used as the target plant, and a physics-based method was used to simulate realistically the movement of the droplets in the air as well as the interaction between the droplets and the plant to obtain the droplet deposition rate under the specified operating parameters. Furthermore, the standard Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the UAV operating parameters to obtain the best operating parameters. The results indicate that using the standard PSO algorithm to optimize the operating parameters of the drone could significantly improve the deposition rate and find the best operating parameters.
Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle, droplet deposition, 3D simulation, particle swarm optimization algorithm
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231601.6581

Citation: Xu L F, Yang Z Z, Huang Z S, Ding W L, Buck-Sorlin G. Effects of flight parameters for plant protection UAV on droplets deposition rate based on a 3D simulation approach. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(1): 66–72.

Keywords


unmanned aerial vehicle, droplet deposition, 3D simulation, particle swarm optimization algorithm

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archambault S. Ecological modernization of the agriculture industry in southern Sweden: Reducing emissions to the Baltic Sea. J Clean Prod., 2004; 12(5): 491–503.

Yuan L, Zhang H B, Zhang Y T, Xing C, Bao Z Y. Feasibility assessment of multi-spectral satellite sensors in monitoring and discriminating wheat diseases and insects. Optik, 2017; 131: 598–608.

Mottes C, Jannoyer M L, Bail M L, Guéné M, Carles C, Malézieux E. Relationships between past and present pesticide applications and pollution at a watershed outlet: The case of a horticultural catchment in Martinique, French West Indies. Chemosphere, 2017; 184: 762–773.

Tokekar P, Hook J V, Mulla D, Isler V. Sensor planning for a symbiotic UAV and UGV system for precision agriculture. IEEE Trans Robot, 2016; 32(6): 1498–1511.

Xu B, Chen L P, Tan Y, Xu M. Rout planning algorithm and verification based on UAN operation path angle inirregular area. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015; 31(23): 173–178. (in Chinese)

Zhang S C, Qiu B J, Xue X Y, Sun T, Peng B. Parameters optimization of crop protection UAS based on the first industry standard of China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 29–35.

Franz E, Bouse L F, Carlton J B, Kirk I W, Latheef M A. Aerial spray deposit relations with plant canopy and weather parameters. Transactions of the ASAE, 1998; 41(4): 959–966.

Lan Y B, Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K, Martin D E, Lopez J D. Spray Drift Mitigation with Spray Mix Adjuvants. Appl Eng Agric, 2008; 24(1): 5–10.

Kirk I W. Measurement and prediction of atomization parameters from fixed-wing aircraft spray nozzles. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007; 50(3): 693–703.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C. Update to the USDA-ARS fixed-wing spray nozzle models. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015; 58(2): 281–295.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bagley W E, Kruger G R, Czaczyk Z, Henry R S. Influence of air shear and adjuvants on spray atomization. ASTM Int., 2014; 33: 151–173.

Huang Y, Zhan W, Fritz B K, Thomson S J. Optimizing selection of controllable variables to minimize downwind drift from aerially applied sprays. Appl Eng Agric, 2012; 28(3): 307–314.

Faical B S, Pessin G, Filho G P R, Carvalho A C P L F, Furquim G, Ueyama J. Fine-tuning of UAV control rules for spraying pesticides on crop fields. Proc ICTAI, 2014; pp.527–533.

Faical B S, Pessin G, Filho G P R, Furquim G, de Carvalho A C P L F, Gomes P H, et al. Exploiting evolution on UAV control rules for spraying pesticides on crop fields. Communications in Comput Information Science, 2014; 459: 49–58.

Hou C J, Tang Y, Luo S M, Lin J T, He Y, Zhuang J J, et al. Optimization of control parameters of droplet density in citrus trees using UAVs and the Taguchi method. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(4): 1–9.

Shi Y H, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer. Proc ICEC, 1998; pp.69–73.

Mohammad S, Jonatan A, Ian J, Chen N, Vladimir O. On new triangle quadrature rules for the locally corrected Nyström method formulated on NURBS-Generated Bézier Surfaces in 3-D. IEEE Trans Ante Prop, 2016; 64(7): 3027–3038.

Ding S, Mannan M A, Poo A N. Oriented bounding box and octree based global interference detection in 5-axis machining of free-form surfaces. Comput-Aided Design, 2004; 36(13): 1281–1294.

Edling R. Kinetic energy, evaporation and wind drift of droplets from low pressure irrigation nozzle. Transactions of the ASAE, 1985; 28(5): 1543–1550.

Dorr G J, Hewitt A J, Adkins S W, Hanan J, Zhang H C, Noller B. A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles. Crop Prot., 2013; 53: 109–117.

Mao T, Kuhn D C S, Tran H. Spread and rebound of liquid droplets upon impact on flat surfaces. AlChE Journal, 1997; 43(9): 2169–2179.

Dorr G J, Forster W A, Mayo L C, McCue S W, Kempthorne D M, Hanan J, et al. Spray retention on whole plants: modelling, simulations and experiments. Crop Prot, 2016; 88: 118–130.

Wang D M, Watkins A P. Numerical modeling of diesel spray wall impaction phenomena. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 1993; 14(3): 301–312.

Roisman I V, Tropea C. Fluctuating flow in a liquid layer and secondary spray created by an impacting spray. Int J Multiph Flow, 2005; 31(2): 179–200.

Roisman I V, Horvat K, Tropea C. Spray impact: Rim transverse

instability initiating fingering and splash, and description of a secondary spray. Phys Fluids, 2006; 18(10): 102–104.

Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proc ICCN95, 1995; pp.1942–1948.

Choset H. Coverage of known spaces: The boustrophedon cellular decomposition. Auton Robot, 2000; 9(3): 247–253.

Xu Y, Bao J, Fu D, Zhu C. Design and experiment of variable spraying system based on multiple combined nozzles. Transactions of the CASE, 2016; 32(17): 47–54. (in Chinese)




Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office