Stability evaluation of the PROSPECT model for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval

Li Zhai, Liang Wan, Dawei Sun, Alwaseela Abdalla, Yueming Zhu, Xiaoran Li, Yong He, Haiyan Cen

Abstract


The radiative transfer model, PROSPECT, has been widely applied for retrieving leaf biochemical traits. However, little work has been conducted to evaluate the stability of the PROSPECT model with consideration of multiple factors (i.e., spectral resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, plant growth stages, and treatments). This study aims to investigate the stability of the PROSPECT model for retrieving leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content (Cab). Leaf hemispherical reflectance and transmittance of oilseed rape were acquired at different spectral resolutions, noise levels, growth stages, and nitrogen treatments. The Chl content was also measured destructively by using a microplate spectrophotometer. The performance of the PROSPECT model was compared with a commonly used random forest (RF) model. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of PROSPECT and RF models for Cab did not produce significant differences under varied spectral resolutions ranging from 1 to 20 nm. The ranges of the relative root mean square errors (rRMSE) of the PROSPECT and RF models were 12%-13% and 11.70%-12.86%, respectively. However, the performance of both models for leaf Chl retrieval was strongly influenced by the noise level with the rRMSE of 13-15.37% and 12.04%-15.80% for PROSPECT and RF, respectively. For different growth stages, the PROSPECT model had similar prediction accuracies (rRMSE = 9.26%-12.41%) to the RF model (rRMSE = 9.17%-12.70%). Furthermore, the superiority of the PROSPECT model (rRMSE = 10.10%-12.82%) over the RF model (rRMSE = 11.81%-15.47%) was prominently observed when tested with plants growth at different nitrogen treatment levels. The results demonstrated that the PROSPECT model has a more stable performance than the RF model for all datasets in this study.
Keywords: leaf chlorophyll content, oilseed rape, PROSPECT, spectral resolution, spectral noise, nitrogen treatment
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211405.6340

Citation: Zhai L, Wan L, Sun D W, Abdalla A, Zhu Y M, Li X R, et al. Stability evaluation of the PROSPECT model for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(5): 189–198.

Keywords


leaf chlorophyll content, oilseed rape, PROSPECT, spectral resolution, spectral noise, nitrogen treatment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Song H, Gao J F, Gao X L, Dai H P, Zhang P A, Wang P K, et al. Relations between photosynthetic parameters and seed yields of Adzuki bean cultivars (Vigna angularis). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012; 11(9): 1453–1461.

Wang L, Sun J, Wang C, Shangguan Z. Leaf photosynthetic function duration during yield formation of large-spike wheat in rainfed cropping systems. PEERJ, 2018; 6: e5532. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5532.

Croft H, Chen J M, Luo X, Bartlett P, Chen B, Staebler R M. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology, 2017; 23(9): 3513–3524.

Rigon J P G, Capuani S, Fernandes D M, Guimarães T M. A novel method for the estimation of soybean chlorophyll content using a smartphone and image analysis. Photosynthetica, 2016; 54(4): 559–566.

Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N. Remote estimation of chlorophyll content in higher plant leaves. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1997; 18(12): 2691–2697.

Liu L, Song B, Zhang S, Liu X. A novel principal component analysis method for the reconstruction of leaf reflectance spectra and retrieval of leaf biochemical contents. Remote Sensing, 2017; 9(11): 1113. doi: 10.3390/rs9111113.

Jiang J, Comar A, Burger P, Bancal P, Weiss M, Baret F. Estimation of leaf traits from reflectance measurements: Comparison between methods based on vegetation indices and several versions of the PROSPECT model. Plant Methods, 2018; 14(1): 1–16.

Li Z, Jin X, Wang J, Yang G, Nie C, Xu X, et al. Estimating winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) LAI and leaf chlorophyll content from canopy reflectance data by integrating agronomic prior knowledge with the PROSAIL model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2015; 36(10): 2634–2653.

Le Maire G, François C, Dufrêne E. Towards universal broad leaf chlorophyll indices using PROSPECT simulated database and hyperspectral reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004; 89(1): 1–28.

Jacquemoud S, Baret F. PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1990; 34(2): 75–91.

Barry K M, Newnham G J, Stone C. Estimation of chlorophyll content in Eucalyptus globulus foliage with the leaf reflectance model PROSPECT. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009; 149(6): 1209–1213.

Li D, Cheng T, Jia M, Zhou K, Lu N, Yao X, et al. PROCWT: Coupling PROSPECT with continuous wavelet transform to improve the retrieval of foliar chemistry from leaf bidirectional reflectance spectra. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018; 206: 1–14.

Féret J B, Gitelson A A, Noble S D, Jacquemoud S. PROSPECT-D: Towards modeling leaf optical properties through a complete lifecycle. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017; 193: 204–215.

Peters R D, Noble S D. Sensitivity and correlation analysis of PROSPECT-D and ABM-B leaf models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020; 58(12): 8258–8267.

Qiu F, Chen J M, Ju W, Wang J, Zhang Q, Fang M. Improving the PROSPECT model to consider anisotropic scattering of leaf internal materials and its use for retrieving leaf biomass in fresh leaves. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018; 56(6): 3119–3136.

Zhang C, Ren H, Liang Y, Liu S, Qin Q, Ersoy O K. Advancing the PROSPECT-5 model to simulate the spectral reflectance of copper-stressed leaves. Remote Sensing, 2017; 9(11): 1191. doi: 10.3390/rs9111191.

Omari K, White H P, Staenz K, King D J. Retrieval of forest canopy parameters by inversion of the PROFLAIR leaf-canopy reflectance model using the LUT approach. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2013; 6(2): 715–723.

Darvishzadeh R, Skidmore A, Schlerf M, Atzberger C. Inversion of a radiative transfer model for estimating vegetation LAI and chlorophyll in a heterogeneous grassland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008; 112(5): 2592–2604.

Wang Z, Skidmore A K, Wang T, Darvishzadeh R, Hearne J. Applicability of the PROSPECT model for estimating protein and cellulose+lignin in fresh leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015; 168: 205–218.

Chemura A, Mutanga O, Odindi J. Empirical modeling of leaf chlorophyll content in Coffee (Coffea Arabica) plantations with Sentinel-2 MSI data: Effects of spectral settings, spatial resolution, and crop canopy cover. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2017; 10(12): 5541–5550.

Shah S H, Angel Y, Houborg R, Ali S, McCabe M F. A random forest machine learning approach for the retrieval of leaf chlorophyll content in wheat. Remote Sensing, 2019;11(8): 920. doi: 10.3390/rs11080920.

Li D, Tian L, Wan Z, Jia M, Yao X, Tian Y, et al. Assessment of unified models for estimating leaf chlorophyll content across directional-hemispherical reflectance and bidirectional reflectance spectra. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019; 231: 111240. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111240.

Baresel J P, Rischbeck P, Hu Y, Kipp S, Hu Y, Barmeier G, et al. Use of a digital camera as alternative method for non-destructive detection of the leaf chlorophyll content and the nitrogen nutrition status in wheat. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017; 140: 25–33.

Roosjen P, Brede B, Suomalainen J M, Bartholomeus H M, Kooistra L, Clevers J. Improved estimation of leaf area index and leaf chlorophyll content of a potato crop using multi-angle spectral data – potential of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018; 66: 14–26.

Gitelson A A, Keydan G P, Merzlyak M N. Three-band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006; 33(11): 11402. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026457.

Cassol D, De Silva F S P, Falqueto A R, Bacarin M A. An evaluation of non-destructive methods to estimate total chlorophyll content. Photosynthetica, 2008; 46(4): 634. doi: 10.1007/s11099-008-0109-6.

Richardson A D, Duigan S P, Berlyn G P. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytologist, 2002; 153(1): 185–194.

Xu M, Liu R, Chen J M, Liu Y, Shang R, Ju W, et al. Retrieving leaf chlorophyll content using a matrix-based vegetation index combination approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019; 224: 60–73.

Jay S, Gorretta N, Morel J, Maupas F, Bendoula R, Rabatel G, et al. Estimating leaf chlorophyll content in sugar beet canopies using millimeter- to centimeter-scale reflectance imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017; 198: 173–186.

Dian Y, Le Y, Fang S, Xu Y, Yao C, Liu G. Influence of spectral bandwidth and position on chlorophyll content retrieval at leaf and canopy levels. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2016; 44(4): 583–593.

Verrelst J, Camps-Valls G, Muñoz-Marí J, Rivera J P, Veroustraete F, Clevers J, et al. Optical remote sensing and the retrieval of terrestrial vegetation bio-geophysical properties – A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2015; 108: 273–290.

Clevers J G P W. Beyond NDVI: Extraction of biophysical variables from remote sensing imagery. Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014; pp. 363–381.

Rivera J P, Verrelst J, Delegido J, Veroustraete F, Moreno J. On the semi-automatic retrieval of biophysical parameters based on spectral index optimization. Remote Sensing, 2014; 6(6): 4927–4951.

Jacquemoud S, Ustin S L, Verdebout J, Schmuck G, Andreoli G, Hosgood B. Estimating leaf biochemistry using the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996; 56(3): 194–202.

Qiu F, Chen J, Ju W, Wang J, Zhang Q. Leaf surface effects on retrieving chlorophyll content from hyperspectral remote sensing. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 2017; pp. 802.

Cogliati S, Verhoef W, Kraft S, Sabater N, Alonso L, Vicent J, et al. Retrieval of sun-induced fluorescence using advanced spectral fitting methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015; 169: 344–357.

Sartory D P, Grobbelaar J U. Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia, 1984; 114(3): 177–187.

Ling Q, Huang W, Jarvis P. Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynthesis Research, 2011; 107(2): 209–214.

Feret J-B, François C, Asner G P, Gitelson A A, Martin R E, Bidel L P R, et al. PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008; 112(6): 3030–3043.

Fukshansky L, Remisowsky A M V, McClendon J, Ritterbusch A, Richter T, Mohr H. Absorption spectra of leaves corrected for scattering and distributional error: a radiative transfer and absorption statistics treatment. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1993; 57(3): 538–555.

Schaepman-Strub G, Schaepman M E, Painter T H, Dangel S, Martonchik J V. Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing—definitions and case studies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006; 103(1): 27–42.

Xu H, Cen H, Wan L, Zhou W, He Y. Assessment of seed yield and quality of winter oilseed rape using chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of pods. Transactions of the ASABE, 2020; 63(2): 231-242.

Wan L, Li Y J, Cen H Y, Zhu J P, Yin W X, Wu W K, et al. Combining UAV-based vegetation indices and image classification to estimate flower number in oilseed rape. Remote Sensing, 2018; 10(9): 1484. doi: 10.3390/rs10091484.

Pavlov Y L. Random forests. Random Forests, 2019; pp. 1–122.

Liu X, Guanter L, Liu L, Damm A, Malenovský Z, Rascher U, et al. Downscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019; 231: 110772. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.035.

Wang L, Zhou X, Zhu X, Dong Z, Guo W. Estimation of biomass in wheat using random forest regression algorithm and remote sensing data. The Crop Journal, 2016; 4(3): 212–219.

Béjaoui B, Armi Z, Ottaviani E, Barelli E, Gargouri-Ellouz E, Chérif R, et al. Random forest model and TRIX used in combination to assess and diagnose the trophic status of Bizerte Lagoon, southern Mediterranean. Ecological Indicators, 2016; 71: 293–301.

Heenkenda M K, Joyce K E, Maier S W, de Bruin S. Quantifying mangrove chlorophyll from high spatial resolution imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2015; 108: 234–244.

Houborg R, McCabe M F. A hybrid training approach for leaf area index estimation via Cubist and random forests machine-learning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2018; 135: 173–188.

Feilhauer H, Asner G P, Martin R E. Multi-method ensemble selection of spectral bands related to leaf biochemistry. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015; 164: 57–65.

Ali A M, Darvishzadeh R, Skidmore A K, van Duren I, Heiden U, Heurich M. Estimating leaf functional traits by inversion of PROSPECT: Assessing leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area in mixed mountainous forest. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2016; 45: 66–76.

Zhang Y, Huang J, Wang F, Blackburn G A, Zhang H K, Wang X, et al. An extended PROSPECT: Advance in the leaf optical properties model separating total chlorophylls into chlorophyll a and b. Scientific Reports, 2017; 7(1): 6429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06694-y.




Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office