Performance evaluation of a multi-rotor unmanned agricultural aircraft system for chemical application
Abstract
Keywords: spray characterization, unmanned agricultural aircraft system, aerial sprayer, onboard data acquisition system, effective swath width, flight parameters, chemical application, performance evaluation
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211404.6194
Citation: Zhu H, Li H Z, Adam A P, Li L J, Tian L. Performance evaluation of a multi-rotor unmanned agricultural aircraft system for chemical application. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(4): 43–52.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Zhang C, Kovacs J. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precision Agriculture, 2012; 13: 693–712.
Zhang N, Wang M, Wang N. Precision agriculture—A worldwide overview. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2002; 36(2-3): 113–132.
Senthold A, Frank A. Future farms without farmers. Science Robotics, 2019; 4(27): 1875. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw1875.
Faical B S, Costa F G, Pessin G, Ueyama J, Freitas H, Colombo A. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor networks for spraying pesticides. Journal of Systems Architecture, 2014; 60: 393–404.
Kim J, Kim S, Ju C, Son H I. Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: a review of perspective of platform, control, and applications. IEEE Access, 2019; 7: 105100–105115.
Zhou Z, Zang Y, Luo X, Lan Y, Xue X. Technology innovation development strategy on agricultural aviation industry for plant protection in China. Transactions of CSAE, 2013; 29: 1–10. (in Chinese)
Zhang C, Kovacs J M. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precision Agriculture, 2012; 13: 693–712.
Shamshiri R R, Hameed I A, Balasundram S K, Ahmad D, Weltzien C, Yamin M. Fundamental research on unmanned aerial vehicles to support precision agriculture in oil palm plantations. INTECH: Agricultural Robots: Fundamentals and Applications, 2018; pp.91–116.
Balasundram S K, Golhani K, Shamshiri R R, Vadamalai G. Precision agriculture technologies for management of plant diseases. In Plant Disease Management Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture through Traditional and Modern Approaches. Springer: Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection, 2020; pp.259–278. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-35955-3_13.
Yang S, Yang X, Mo J. The application of unmanned aircraft systems to plant protection in China. Precision Agriculture, 2018; 19: 278–292.
Huang Y, Thomson S J, Hoffman W C, Lan Y, Fritz B K. Development and prospect of unmanned aerial vehicle technologies for agricultural production management. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2013; 6: 1–10.
Yang C. Remote sensing and precision agriculture technologies for crop disease detection and management with a practical application example. Engineering, 2019; 10: 015. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.10.015.
Zhang H, Wang X, Chen Y, Jiang G, Lin S. Research on vision-based navigation for plant-protection UAV under the near color background. Symmetry, 2019; 11: 533. doi: 10.3390/sym11040533
Wang S, Han Y, Chen J, Du N, Pan Y, Wang G. Flight safety strategy analysis of the plant protection UAV. IFAC Papers online, 2018; 21: 262–267.
Wen S, Zhang Q, Deng J, Lan Y, Yin X, Shan J. Design and experiment of a variable spray system for unmanned aerial vehicles based on PID and PWM control. Applied Sciences, 2018; 8(12): 2482. doi: 10.3390/ app8122482.
Huang Y, Hoffmann W C, Lan Y, Wu W, Fritz B K. Development of a spray system for unmanned aerial vehicle platform. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2009; 25(6): 803–809.
Thomson S J, Womac A R, Mulrooney J E. Reducing pesticide drift by considering propeller rotation effects from aerial application near buffer zones. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2013; 2(3): 41-51.
Brown C R, Giles D K. Measurement of pesticide drift from unmanned aerial vehicle application to a vineyard. Transactions of ASABE, 2018; 61: 1539–1546.
Ru Y, Jin L, Zhou H P, Jia Z C. Performance experiment of rotary hydraulic atomizing nozzle for aerial spraying application. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(3): 50–55. (in Chinese)
Nuyttens D D S M, Baetens K, Brusselman E, Dekeyser D, Verboven P. Drift from field crop sprayers using an integrated approach: Results of a 5-year study. Transactions of the ASABE, 2011; 54(2): 403–408.
Ansara N, Parvez M, John S P, John D, Arko L, Mirek M. Portable device for continuous sensing with rapidly pulsed LEDs – Part 1: Rapid on-the-fly processing of large data streams using an open source microcontroller with field programmable gate array. Measurement, 2019; 146: 749–757.
Cos C R, Acosta J A, Ollero A. Adaptive integral inverse kinematics control for lightweight compliant manipulators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020; 5: 3468–3474.
Wendel J, Meister O, Schlail E C, Trommer G F. An integrated GPS/MEMS-IMU navigation system for an autonomous helicopter. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006; 10: 527–533.
Peng Y, Liu X, Sun Z, Ji C, Li L, Wu Z. Exploiting the bulk photovoltaic effect in a 2D trilayered hybrid ferroelectric for highly sensitive polarized light detection. Angewandte Chemie, 2020; 132: 3961–3965.
Mestre G, Ruano A, Duarte H, Silva S, Khosravani H, Pesteh S. An intelligent weather station. Sensors, 2015; 15: 31005–31022.
Hojaiji H, Kalantarian H, Bui A T, King C E, Sarrafzadeh M. Temperature and humidity calibration of a low-cost wireless dust sensor for real-time monitoring. In: 2017 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). Glassboro, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017; 7894056. doi: 10.1109/SAS.2017.7894056.
Jan S, Chen Y. Establishing unusual-weather detection system prototype using onboard sensor information. In: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2019; pp.1281-1290. doi: 10.2514/1.C034630.
Wang G, Li Y. Parabolic PWM for current control of voltage-source converters (VSCs). International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 2010; 57(10): 3491–3496.
Aragon J D, Morgado E A, Perez P F. Low-cost servomotor driver for PFM control. Sensors, 2018; 18(1): 93. doi: 10.3390/s18010093.
Chuang SY, Sahoo N, Lin H, Chang Y. Predictive maintenance with sensor data analytics on a Raspberry Pi-based experimental platform. Sensors, 2019; 19(18): 3884. doi: 10.3390/s19183884.
Wilkes TC, McGonigle A J S, Pering T D, Taggart A J, White BS, Bryant R G. Ultraviolet imaging with low cost smartphone sensors: development and application of a Raspberry Pi-based UV camera. Sensors, 2016; 16(10): 1649. doi: 10.3390/s16101649.
Olivier B. Pyo, the Python DSP toolbox. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2016; 16:1214–1217. doi: 10.1145/2964284.2973804.
Wang J, Lan Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wen S, Yao W. Drift and deposition of pesticide applied by UAV on pineapple plants under different meteorological conditions. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2018; 11(6): 5–12.
Li J, Lan Y, Wang J. Distribution law of rice pollen in the wind field of small UAV. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017; 10(4): 32–40.
Zhang Y, Li Y, He Y, Liu F, Cen H, Fang H. Near ground platform development to simulate UAV aerial spraying and its spraying test under different conditions. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017; 148: 8–18.
Arvidsson T, Bergstrom L, Kreuger J. Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors. Pest Management Science, 2011; 67: 586–598.
Lechoczki K S, Toth B, Kotai C, Martonosi I, Farady L, Kondrak L. Chemical control of FHB in wheat with different nozzle types and fungicides. Cereal Research Communications, 2008; 36: 677–681.
Creech C F, Henry R S, Fritz B K, Kruger G R. Influence of herbicide active ingredient, nozzle type, orifice size, spray pressure, and carrier volume rate on spray droplet size characteristics. Weed Technology, 2015; 29: 298–310.
Boller W, Machry M. Operating pressure and spray nozzles effects on the efficiency of contact herbicide in soybeans. Engenharia Agricola, 2007; 27: 722–727.
Schneider J L, Oliveira G M, Balan R E, Canteri MG, Saab O J. Spray droplet coverage achieved with different nozzles and application rates in the aerial part of sugar cane. Ciencia Rural, 2013; 43: 797–802.
Post S L, Roten R L, Connell R J. Discharge coefficients of flan-fan nozzles. Transactions of the ASABE, 2017; 60: 347–351.
Fox R D, Derksen R C, Cooper J A, Krause C R, Ozkan H E. Visual and image system measurement of spray deposits using water-sensitive paper. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2003; 19(5): 549–552.
Thompson S J, Lyu M E. Environmental and spray mixture effects on deposit size represented by water-sensitive paper used in drift studies. Transactions of the ASABE, 2011, 54: 803–807.
Hoffman W C, Hewitt A J. Comparison of three imaging systems for water-sensitive papers. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2005, 21: 961–964.
Zhu H, Salyani M, Fox R D. A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011, 76: 38–43.
Chen S, Lan Y, Zhou Z, Ou Y, Wang G, Huang X. Effect of Droplet Size Parameters on Droplet Deposition and Drift of Aerial Spraying by Using Plant Protection UAV. Agronomy, 2020, 10: 195. doi: 10.3390/ agronomy10020195.
Joao P A R, Elton F R, Heli H T A, Thiago N L. Evaluation of Droplet Spectra of the Spray Tip AD 11002 Using Different Techniques. Engenharia Agricola 2019, 39: 476–481.
Lyu M, Xiao S, Yu T, He Y. Influence of UAV flight speed on droplet deposition characteristics with the application of infrared thermal imaging. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(3): 10–17.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.