Development of droplet characteristics prediction models for air induction nozzles based on wind tunnel tests

Juan Liao, Andrew John Hewitt, Pei Wang, Xiwen Luo, Ying Zang, Zhiyan Zhou, Yubin Lan, Chris O’Donnell

Abstract


Nozzle flowrate and spray pressure are two of the most important factors influencing on droplet characteristics. With the aim to develop prediction models for air-induction nozzles (AINs), a series of Billericay Farm Services (BFS) AINs with different orifice diameters in combination with tap water were tested. 0.2 MPa, 0.3 MPa, 0.4 MPa, 0.5 MPa, 0.6 MPa and 0.7 MPa of spray pressures and 2 m/s, 3 m/s, 4 m/s and 5 m/s of air speeds were setup. Based on the wind tunnel tests data, prediction models with input variables of nozzle flowrate and spray pressure and output variables of Dv0.1, Dv0.5, Dv0.9, %<150 µm (proportion of spray volume contained in droplets with diameter below 150 µm), relative span (RS) and coefficient of variation (CV) of Dv0.5 were developed. The developed models were validated based on wind tunnel experimental data. Results showed that: for Dv0.1, Dv0.5, Dv0.9 and %<150 µm, R2 were equal to 0.768, 0.823, 0.868 and 0.811, indicating that the predictive ability for these four parameters were strong. For RS and CV, R2 were equal to 0.100 and 0.113, respectively, indicating that the predictive ability for these two parameters were poor. The models developed in the present study are helpful for facilitating the use of AIN in agricultural spray application.
Keywords: prediction model, agricultural spray application, droplet characteristics, AIN, laser diffraction
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191206.5014

Citation: Liao J, Hewitt A J, Wang P, Luo X W, Zang Y, Zhou Z Y, et al. Development of droplet characteristics prediction models for air induction nozzles based on wind tunnel tests. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(6): 1–6.

Keywords


prediction model, agricultural spray application, droplet characteristics, AIN, laser diffraction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Faical B S, Ueyama J, de Carvalho A C P L F. The use of autonomous UAVs to improve pesticide application in crop fields. 17th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), IEEE, Porto, Portugal, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/MDM.2016.96

Craig D O, Fernandez-Cornejo J. Economic and policy issues of U.S. agricultural pesticide use trends. Pest Manag Sci, 2013; 69(9): 1001–1025.

Rincón V J, Sánchez-Hermosilla J, Páez F, Pérez-Alonso J, Callejón Ángel J. Assessment of the influence of working pressure and application rate on pesticide spray application with a hand-held spray gun on greenhouse pepper crops. Crop Prot, 2017; 96: 7–13.

Hoffmann W C, Hewitt A J, Ross J B. Spray adjuvant effects on droplet size spectra measured by three laser-based systems in a high-speed wind tunnel. Journal of ASTM International, 2008; 5(6): 1–12.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Kruger G R, Henry R S, Hewitt A J, Czaczyk Z. Comparison of drop size data from ground and aerial application nozzles at three testing laboratories. Atomization Spray, 2014; 24(2): 181–192.

Meng Y H, Lan Y B, Mei G Y, Guo Y W, Song J L, Wang Z G. Effect of aerial spray adjuvant applying on the efficiency of small unmanned aerial vehicle for wheat aphids control. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(5): 46–53.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Martin D E, Thomson S J. Aerial Application Methods for Increasing Spray Deposition on Wheat Heads. Appl Eng Agric, 2007; 23(6): 709–715.

Nuyttens D, De Schampheleire M, Baetens K and Pieter V. Drift from field crop sprayers using an integrated approach: results of a 5 year study. Transactions of ASABE, 2011; 54(2): 403–408.

Zhang D Y, Chen L P, Zhang R R, Xu G, Lan Y B, Hoffmann W C, et al. Evaluating effective swath width and droplet distribution of aerial spraying systems on M-18B and Thrush 510G airplanes. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(2): 21–30.

Wang J, Lan Y B, Zhang H H, Zhang Y L, Wen S, Yao W X et al. Drift and deposition of pesticide applied by UAV on pineapple plants under different meteorological conditions. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(6): 5–12.

Wang X N, He X K, Song J L, Wang Z C, Wang C L, Wang S L, et al. Drift potential of UAV with adjuvants in aerial applications. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(5): 54–58.

Akesson N B, Gibbs R E. Pesticide drop size as a function of spray atomizers and liquid formulations. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, 1990; 10: 170–183.

Teske M E, Bowers J F, Rafferty J E, Baetens K, Barry J W. FSCBG: an aerial spray dispersion model for predicting the fate of released material behind aircraft. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1993; 12: 453–464.

Barry J W, Skyler P J, Teske M E, Rafferty J A, Grim B S. Predicting and measuring drift of Bacillus thuringiensis sprays. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1993; 12: 1977–1989.

Teske M E, Bird S L, Esterly D M, Curbishley T B, Ray S L, Perry SG. AgDRIFT: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2002; 21(3): 659–671.

Krueger S, Cantrell W, Niedermeier D. An economical model for simulating droplet spectrum evolution in turbulent cloud chambers and wind tunnels. APS Meeting, APS, New Orleans, LA, US, 2017.

Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K, Lan Y B, Zollinger R, Rhode A, Dean S W. Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology High-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing Protocol. Journal of ASTM International, 2009; 6(4): 102–122.

Yao W, Lan Y B, Wen S, Zhang H H, Zhang Y L, Wang J, et al. Evaluation of droplet deposition and effect of variable-rate application by a manned helicopter with AG-NAV Guía system. Int J Agric & Biol Eng. 2019; 12(1): 172–178.

Chen S D, Lan Y B, Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Liu A M, Mao Y D. Effect of wind field below unmanned helicopter on droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 67–77.

Hoffmann C W, Fritz K B, Bagley W E, Lan Y B. Effects of air speed and liquid temperature on droplet size. Journal of ASTM International, 2011; 8(4): 1–9.

Butler Ellis M C, Alanis R, Lane A G, Tuck C R, Nuyttens D, van de Zande J C. Wind tunnel measurements and model predictions for estimating spray drift reduction under field conditions. Biosyst Eng, 2017; 154: 25–34.

Eshel G, Levy G J, Mingelgrin U, Singer M J. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2004; 68(3): 736–743.

Nicholls J W, Dorr G J, Woods N, Hewitt A J. Anti-drift adjuvants?: a droplet spectra study. Aspects of Applied Biology, 2004; 71: 175–182.

Brian E. The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U K, 1998. ISBN: 0521593468.

Lotfi S, Rem P, Deja J, Mróz R. An experimental study on the relation between input variables and output quality of a new concrete recycling process. Constr Build Mater, 2017; 137: 128–140.

SPSSS. 19.0. 0 for Windows Software. SPSS Inc., IBM Company, USA, 2010.

Zoz F, Iaconelli C, Lang E, Iddir H, Guyot S, Grandvalet C, et al. Control of Relative Air Humidity as a Potential Means to Improve Hygiene on Surfaces: A Preliminary Approach with Listeria monocytogenes. Plos One, 2016; 11(2): 1–14.

Nuzzo R. Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature, 2014; 506(7484): 150–152.

Libraries KSU. SPSS Tutorials: Pearson Correlation. http://libguides.library.kent.edu/SPSS/PearsonCorr, 2017.

Külz A K, Landmann S, Cludius B, Hottenrott B, Rose N, Heidenreich T, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Bmc Psychiatry, 2014; 14(314): 1–9.

Nagelkerke N J D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 1991; 78(3): 691–692.

Bailey R A. Design of comparative experiments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U K, 2008, ISBN: 9780511394188.

Cortina J M, Green J P, Keeler K R, Vandenberg R J. Degrees of freedom in SEM: Are we testing the models that we claim to test? Organ Res Methods, 2017; 20(3): 350–378.

Brewer K, Bareiss C. Concise guide to computing foundations: Core concepts and select scienti¬fic applications. Springer, Cham, New York, U S, 2016. ISBN: 978-3-319-29954-9.

Maszczyk P, Babkiewicz E, Czarnockacieciura M, Maciej Gliwicz Z, Gliwicz M, Urban P. Ideal free distribution of Daphnia under predation risk—model predictions and experimental verification. Journal of Plankton Research, 2018; 40(4): 471–485.

Hoffman W C, Fritz B K, Farooq M, Cooperband M F. Effects of wind speed on aerosol spray penetration in adult mosquito bioassay cages. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2008; 24(3): 419–426.




Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office