Design and evaluation of a two-section canopy shaker with variable frequency for mechanical harvesting of citrus

Yingjun Pu, Arash Toudeshki, Reza Ehsani, Fuzeng Yang

Abstract


Canopy shaking is one of the most commonly used techniques for mechanical harvesting of citrus fruits in orange juice industry. However, tree damage and low harvesting efficiency are the top concerns of growers in adopting the existing harvesting equipment on a large scale. The purpose of this research was to develop a novel canopy shaking system to minimize tree damage and maximize fruit removal for mechanical citrus harvesting. In this study, a two-section canopy shaker composing of top and bottom shaking systems mounted on two rotating drums was proposed and developed. It was configured with two sets of flexible bow-shaped shaking rods in a staggered distribution, which can shake the top and bottom zones of the tree canopy independently. The shaking system was designed based on a linked crank-rocker mechanism. Kinematic simulation analysis was conducted to verify the quick return characteristics and differential properties of this mechanism. Vibration test showed that the frequency of the shaking rod could be adjusted within a range of 1.1-8.8 Hz related to hydraulic motor speeds. The field tests of the shaking system with an average frequency of 4.7 Hz achieved a fruit removal percentage of 82.6% and tree damage rate of 5.4% under a tractor speed of 3 km/h. By contrast, the combined shaking frequency of 4.7 Hz & 4.1 Hz of the canopy shaker produced less tree damage with a percentage of 3.9%. This study indicated that the two-section canopy shaker with an optimized frequency combination could be adaptable to the different zones of the tree canopy, and obtain lower tree damage and higher fruit removal percentage.
Keywords: two-section canopy shaker, crank-rocker mechanism, variable frequency, fruit removal percentage, tree damage rate, citrus mechanical harvesting
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20181105.4445

Citation: Pu Y J, Toudeshki A, Ehsani R, Yang F Z. Design and evaluation of a two-section canopy shaker with variable frequency for mechanical harvesting of citrus. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(5): 77–87.

Keywords


two-section canopy shaker, crank-rocker mechanism, variable frequency, fruit removal percentage, tree damage rate, citrus mechanical harvesting

Full Text:

PDF

References


FAOSTAT. Crops statistical databases. 2016. http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/#data. Accessed on [2018-07-10].

USDA-NASS. Citrus statistics 2015-2016. D.C.: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Florida Field Office. 2017. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/Publications/Citrus/. Accessed on [2017-08-26]

Sanders K F. Orange harvesting systems review. Biosyst Eng, 2005; 90(2): 115–125.

Roka, F M, Hyman B R. Measuring productivity of citrus hand harvesters and assessing implications on harvest costs and mechanical harvesting developments. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 2013. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe933. Accessed on [2018-07-21]

Calvin, L, Martin, P. The U.S. produce industry and labor: Facing the future in a global economy. D.C.: USDA Economic Research Service, 2010. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=44766. Accessed on [2017-08-02]

Li P L, Lee S H, Hsu H Y. Review on fruit harvesting method for potential use of automatic fruit harvesting systems. Procedia Engineering, 2011; 23: 351–366.

Coppock G E. Picking citrus fruit by mechanical means. Proc Flo State Hort Soc, 1961; 74: 247–251.

Roka F M, Ehsani R J, Futch S H, Hyman B R. Citrus mechanical harvesting systems-Trunk shakers. Florida:Food and Economic Resources Department, 2014; UF/IFAS Extension.

Roka F M, Ehsani R J, Futch S H, Hyman B R. Citrus mechanical harvesting systems-Continuous canopy shakers. Florida: Food and Economic Resources Department, 2014; UF/IFAS Extension.

Whitney J D. Field test results with mechanical harvesting equipment in Florida oranges. Appl Eng Agric, 1999; 15(3): 205–210.

Sumner H R. Selective harvesting of valencia oranges with a vertical canopy shaker. T Asae, 1973; 16(6): 1024–1026.

Castro-Garcia S, Rosa U A, Gliever C J, Smith D, Burns J K, Krueger W H, et al. Video evaluation of table olive damage during harvest with a canopy shaker. Horttechnology, 2009; 19(2): 260–266.

Sola-Guirado R R, Castro-Garcia S, Blanco-Roldan G L, Jimenez-Jimenez F, Castillo-Ruiz F J, Gil-Ribes J A. Traditional olive tree response to oil olive harvesting technologies. Biosyst Eng, 2014; 118: 186–193.

Sola-Guriado R R, Blanco-Roldan G L, Gil-Ribes J A. New harvester

machine for traditional olive orchards: agronomic and industrial engineering. Dyna-Bilbao, 2018; 93(1): 60–66.

Lang Z. Lincoln canopy apple harvester using a continuous horizontal shaking method. J Agr Eng Res, 1989; 44(4): 267–273.

Ferreira L D, da Silva F M, Ferreira D D, Sales R S. Recommendation for mechanical harvesting of coffee based on vibration behavior settings rods harvesters. Cienc Rural, 2016; 46(2): 273–278.

Caprara C, Pezzi F. Measuring the stresses transmitted during mechanical grape harvesting. Biosyst Eng, 2011; 110(2): 97–105.

Yu P C, Li C Y, Takeda F, Krewer G, Rains G, Hamrita T. Measurement of mechanical impacts created by rotary, slapper, and sway blueberry mechanical harvesters. Comput Electron Agr, 2014; 101: 84–92.

Brown G K. New mechanical harvesters for the Florida citrus juice industry. Horttechnology, 2005; 15(1): 69–72.

Whitney J. Performance of mechanical citrus harvesters in Florida. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 2000; 277–279.

Savary S K J U, Ehsani R, Schueller J K, Rajaraman B P. Simulation study of citrus tree canopy motion during harvesting using a canopy shaker. Trans of the ASABE, 2010; 53(5): 1373–1381.

Pezzi F, Caprara C. Mechanical grape harvesting: Investigation of the transmission of vibrations. Biosyst Eng, 2009; 103(3): 281–286.

Spann T M, Danyluk M D. Mechanical harvesting increases leaf and stem debris in loads of mechanically harvested citrus fruit. Hortscience, 2010; 45(8): 1297–1300.

Gupta S K, Ehsani R, Kim N H. Optimization of a citrus canopy shaker harvesting system: Mechanistic tree damage and fruit detachment models. Trans of the ASABE, 2016; 59(4): 761–776.

Roka, F M, House L A, Mosley K R. Mechanically harvesting sweet orange trees in Florida: Addressing grower concerns about production and long-term tree health.Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 2014. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ fe949. Accessed on [2018-07-21]

Coppock G E. Properties of young and mature'Valencia'oranges related to selective harvest by mechanical means. Trans of the ASAE, 1972; 15(2): 0235–0238.

Hong M Y, Rosa U A, Upadhyaya S K. Optimum operating parameters for a rotary drum shaker for harvesting jatropha curcas L. Trans of the ASABE, 2012; 55(6): 2051–2058.

Sola-Guirado R R, Blanco-Roldan G L, Castro-Garcia S, Castillo-Ruiz F J, Gil-Ribes J A. Innovative circular path harvester for mechanical harvesting of irregular and large-canopy olive trees. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(3): 86–93.

Chen D, Du X Q, Wang S M, Zhang Q. Mechanism of vibratory fruit harvest and review of current advance. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011; 27(8): 195–200. (in Chinese)

Du X Q, Wu C Y, He L Y, Tong J H. Dynamic characteristics of dwarf Chinese hickory trees under impact excitations for mechanical fruit harvesting. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(1): 17–25.

Whitney J, Wheaton T. Tree spacing affects citrus fruit distribution and yield. Proc Fla State Hort Soc, 1984; 97: 44–47.

Peterson D. Mechanical harvester for process oranges. Appl Eng Agric, 1998; 14(5): 455–458.

Gupta S K, Ehsani R, Kim N H. Optimization of a citrus canopy shaker harvesting system: Properties and modeling of tree limbs. Trans of the ASABE, 2015; 58(4): 971–985.

Lun M, Leu Y H. Design of crank-rocker mechanisms with optimum transmission angle over working stroke. Mech Mach Theory, 1996; 31(4): 501–511.

Fan Y X, Zhang Q. Machine theory and mechanical design. In Chapter 4: Planar Linkage Mechanisms. Beijing: Qinghua University Press, 2014. pp: 47–73. (in Chinese)

Pu Y J, Toudeshki A, Ehsani R, Yang F Z, Abdulridha J. Selection and experimental evaluation of shaking rods of canopy shaker to reduce tree damage for citrus mechanical harvesting. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(2): 48–54.

Castro-Garcia S, Blanco-Roldan G L, Ferguson L, Gonzalez-Sanchez E J, Gil-Ribes J A. Frequency response of late-season 'Valencia' orange to selective harvesting by vibration for juice industry. Biosyst Eng, 2017; 155: 77–83.

Leone A, Romaniello R, Tamborrino A, Catalano P, Peri G. Identification of vibration frequency, acceleration, and duration for efficient olive harvesting using a trunk shaker. Trans of the ASABE, 2015; 58(1): 19–26.

Shamshiri, R, Ehsani, R, Maja, J M, Roka, F M. Determining machine efficiency parameters for a citrus canopy shaker using yield monitor data. Applied engineering in Agriculture, 2013; 29(1): 33–41.

Zhou J, He L, Zhang Q, Du X, Chen D, Karkee M. Evaluation of the influence of shaking frequency and duration in mechanical harvesting of sweet cherry. Appl Eng Agric, 2013; 29(5): 607–612.

Ortiz C, Torregrosa A. Determining adequate vibration frequency, amplitude, and time for mechanical harvesting of fresh mandarins. T ASABE, 2013; 56(1): 15–22.

Willis J R, Milton G W. On modifications of Newton's second law and linear continuum elastodynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2007; 463(2079): 855–880.

Yunt K. The impulsive action integral for rigid-body mechanical systems

with impacts. J Comput Nonlin Dyn, 2012; 7(3): 636–647.

Castro-Garcia S, Blanco-Roldán G L, Ferguson L, González-Sánchez E J, Gil-Ribes J A. Frequency response of late-season ‘Valencia’ orange to selective harvesting by vibration for juice industry. Biosyst Eng, 2017; 155: 77–83.

Burns J K, Buker R S, Roka F M. Mechanical harvesting capacity in sweet orange is increased with an abscission agent. Horttechnology, 2005; 15(4): 758–765.

Blanco-Roldan G L, Gil-Ribes J A, Kouraba K, Castro-Garcia S. Effects of trunk shaker duration and repetitions on removal efficiency for the harvesting of oil olives. Appl Eng Agric, 2009; 25(3): 329–334.

Castro-Garcia S, Sola-Guirado R R, Gil-Ribes J A. Vibration analysis of the fruit detachment process in late-season ‘Valencia’ orange with canopy shaker technology. Biosyst Eng, 2018; 170: 130–137.




Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office