Urease activity and urea hydrolysis rate under coupling effects of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen application rate

Tao Lei, Qiongqiong Gu, Xianghong Guo, Juanjuan Ma, Yong Zhang, Xihuan Sun

Abstract


The traditional qualitative analysis of the individual factors on the kinetic parameters cannot sufficiently reveal the mechanism underlying urea hydrolysis in soil. This study aimed at revealing the coupling effects of the three factors on urease activity (V0), hydrolysis rate constant (Ku), and activation energy (Ea) and establishing the quantitative model for Ku under the coupling condition. Laboratory culture experiments were conducted under different temperatures (T) (15°C, 20°C, 25°C, and 35°C), moisture contents (θ) (60%, 80%, and 100% of field capacities), and nitrogen application rates (F) (247 mg/kg, 309 mg/kg, 371 mg/kg, and 433 mg/kg). The urea content was measured daily. Results showed that the effects of moisture content, temperature, nitrogen application rate, and their interaction on V0 and Ku were in the descending order: T, F, T*F, θ, T*θ, F*θ, T*θ*F. The effect of single factor and two-factor coupling on V0 was extremely significant (p<0.01), whereas the effect of the three-factor coupling on V0 was negligible. The effects of three factors and their interaction on Ku were extremely significant (p<0.01). The effects of moisture content, nitrogen application rate, and their interaction on Ea were in the descending order: F, θ, F*θ. The effects of two factors and their interaction on Ea were not significant. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values of the established Ku-1 (θ, T, F) and Ku-2(θ, T, F) models were 3.14% and 4.60%, respectively. The MAPE of the traditional Arrhenius model Ku-3(T) was 6.75%. The accuracy of the proposed three-factor interaction model was superior to that of the traditional single factor model. The results supplemented the mechanism of urea hydrolysis and improved the prediction accuracy of Ku.
Keywords: urease activity, hydrolysis rate constant, Arrhenius model, activation energy, coupling effect
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20181102.3784

Citation: Lei T, Gu Q Q, Guo X H, Ma J J, Zhang Y, Sun X H. Urease activity and urea hydrolysis rate under coupling effects of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen application rate. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(2): 132–138.

Keywords


urease activity, hydrolysis rate constant, Arrhenius model, activation energy, coupling effect

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wang L L, Li W Z, Wang Z J, Wang Z W, Sui C, Li Y. Effects of digestate application depth on soil nitrogen volatilization and vertical distribution. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(5): 101–107.

Zhao Z P, Duan M, Yan S, Liu Z F, Wang Q, Fu J, et al. Effects of different fertilizations on fruit quality, yield and soil fertility in field-grown kiwifruit orchard. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10: 162–171.

Zhao Z P, Yan S, Liu F, Ji P H, Wang X Y, Tong Y A. Effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic manure on Fuji apple quality, yield and soil fertility in apple orchard on the Loess Plateau of China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7: 45–55.

Wang C F, Shao X H, Xu H L, Chang T T, Wang W N. Effects of compound microbial inoculant treated wastewater irrigation on soil nutrients and enzyme activities. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9: 100–108.

Yang X, Wu L, Wu S, Chen J. Nitrogen release characteristic of polymer coated urea in paddy soil and its relationship with cumulative temperature. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016; 32: 199–204. (in Chinese)

Antil D R S, Mahata M K, Narwal R P. Effect of substrate concentration, soil moisture, and organic materials on urease activity of soil contaminated with lead. Archives of Agronomy & Soil Science, 2006; 52: 61–68.

Moyo C C, Kissel D E, Cabrera M L. Temperature effects on soil urease activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1989; 21: 935–938.

Sardans J, PeñUelas J, Estiarte M. Changes in soil enzymes related to C and N cycle and in soil C and N content under prolonged warming and drought in a Mediterranean shrubland. Applied Soil Ecology, 2008; 39: 223–235.

Liang X Q, Yuan YJ, He M M, Hua L, Liang L, Tian G M. Modeling the fate of fertilizer N in paddy rice systems receiving manure and urea. Geoderma, 2014; 228–229: 54–61.

Rodríguez S B, Alonso-Gaite A, Álvarez-Benedí J. Characterization of

nitrogen transformations, sorption and volatilization processes in urea fertilized soils. Vadose zone journal, 2005; 4: 329–336.

Chauhan H S, Mishra B. Ammonia volatilization from a flooded rice field fertilized with amended urea materials. Fertilizer research, 1989; 19: 57–63.

Lal R, Kissel D, Cabrera M, Schwab A. Kinetics of urea hydrolysis in wheat residue. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1993; 25: 1033–1036.

Sankhayan S D, Shukla U C. Rates of urea hydrolysis in five soils of India. Geoderma, 1976; 16: 171–178.

Chowdary V M, Rao N H, Sarma P B S. A coupled soil water and nitrogen balance model for flooded rice fields in India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004; 103: 425–441.

Liang X Q, Chen Y X, Li H, Tian G M, Ni W Z, He M M, et al. Modeling transport and fate of nitrogen from urea applied to a near-trench paddy field. Environmental Pollution, 2007; 150: 313–320.

Liang X Q, Li Y J, He M M, Hua L, Liang L, Tian G M. Modeling the fate of fertilizer N in paddy rice systems receiving manure and urea. Geoderma, 2014; 228: 54–61.

Todd R W, Cole N A, Waldrip H M, Aiken R M. Arrhenius equation for modeling feedyard ammonia emissions using temperature and diet crude protein. J Environ Qual, 2013; 42: 666–671.

Dessureault-Rompré J, Zebarth B J, Georgallas A, Burton D L, Grant C A, Drury C F. Temperature dependence of soil nitrogen mineralization rate: Comparison of mathematical models, reference temperatures and origin of the soils. Geoderma, 2010; 157: 97–108.

Frøseth R B, Bleken M A. Effect of low temperature and soil type on the decomposition rate of soil organic carbon and clover leaves, and related priming effect. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015; 80: 156–166.

Vourlitis G L, DeFotis C, Kristan W. Effects of soil water content, temperature and experimental nitrogen deposition on nitric oxide (NO) efflux from semiarid shrubland soil. Journal of Arid Environments, 2015; 117: 67–74.

Cabrera M L, Kissel D E, Bock B R. Urea hydrolysis in soil: Effects of urea concentration and soil pH. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1991; 23: 1121–1124.

Yadav D, Kumar V, Singh M, Relan P. Effect of temperature and moisture on kinetics of urea hydrolysis and nitrification. Soil Research, 1987; 25: 185–191.

Singh R, Nye P H. The effect of soil pH and high urea concentrations on urease activity in soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 1985; 35: 519–527.

Dalal R. Urease activity in some Trinidad soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1975; 7: 5–8.

Gou W, Zheng P F, Tian L, Gao M, Zhang L X, Akram N A, et al. Exogenous application of urea and a urease inhibitor improves drought stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Plant Research, 2017; 130: 599–609.

Sudkolai S T, Nourbakhsh F. Urease activity as an index for assessing the maturity of cow manure and wheat residue vermicomposts. Waste Management, 2017; 64: 63–66.

Burns R G. Soil enzymes. London: Academic Press, 1978.

Suter H C, Pengthamkeerati P, Walker C, Chen D. Influence of temperature and soil type on inhibition of urea hydrolysis by N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide in wheat and pasture soils in south-eastern Australia. Soil Research, 2011; 49: 315–319.

Pauling L. General chemistry. Massachusetts: Courier Corporation, 2014.

Hartley I P, Ineson P. Substrate quality and the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008; 40: 1567–1574.

Rachinskii V, Pelttser A. Effect of temperature on rate of decomposition of urea in soil. Agrokhimiya, 1967; 10: 75–77.

Gould W, Cook F, Webster G. Factors affecting urea hydrolysis in several Alberta soils. Plant and Soil, 1973; 38: 393–401.




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office